any anticoagulant versus aspirin | |||
EPSIM, 1982 | anticoagulant versus aspirin 500mg three times daily | patients surviving myocardial infarction | open Follow-up duration: 29 months (range 6-59) |
any anticoagulant versus placebo | |||
Sixty Plus reinfarction Study, 1980 | anticoagulant versus placebo | over 60 years of age | double blind Follow-up duration: 2 years |
Argatroban versus heparin | |||
ARGAMI-2, 1998 | Argatroban 60–20 mg/kg bolus; 2–4 µg /kg/min infusion for 72h versus UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion | AMI | Follow-up duration: 30 days |
bivalirudin versus heparin | |||
HERO, 1997 | Bivalirudin 0.125–0.250 mg/kg bolus; 0.125–0.500 mg /kg/min infusion for 72h versus UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000–1200 IU/h infusion | AMI (patients presenting within 12 hours with ST-segment elevation) | double blind Follow-up duration: 35 days |
coumadin versus aspirin | |||
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002 | coumadin (phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol) target INR 3-4 versus aspirin 80mg daily | Acute MI, unstable angina | open Follow-up duration: 1 year (range 0-26 months) the Netherlands |
coumadin versus control (on top of aspirin) | |||
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002 | coumadin(INR mean 2.4) +aspirin
versus aspirin | Acute MI, unstable angina | open Follow-up duration: 1 year the Netherlands |
coumadin versus placebo | |||
ASPECT, 1994 | nicoumalone or phenprocoumon, target INR 2.8–4.8 versus placebo | hospital survivors of myocardial infarction | double blind Follow-up duration: 37 months (range 6-76) |
Dalteparin versus placebo | |||
BIOMACS II, 1999 | Dalteparin 100 mg/kg, 2 doses versus placebo | patients with acute myocardial infarction, Age <=80 y, STEMI or new LBBB | Double-blind Follow-up duration: 14–21 d |
FRAMI, 1997 | Dalteparin 150 mg/kg BID for 7–11 d versus placebo | patients with an acute MI, Q wave or STEMI | Double-blind Follow-up duration: in hospital |
Dalteparin versus UFH | |||
ASSENT Plus, 2003 | Dalteparin first dose 90 IU/kg, then 120 IU/kg BID, 4–7 d versus UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 800–1000 IU/h for 48 h | Patients with AMI treated with alteplase | open Follow-up duration: 30 d |
Enoxaparin versus placebo | |||
AMI-SK, 2002 | Enoxaparin 30 mg IV bolus, 1 mg/kg for 3–8 d versus placebo | patients with evolving myocardial infarction, Age >=18 y, STEMI | Double-blind Follow-up duration: 30 d |
Enoxaparin versus UFH | |||
ASSENT 3 Plus, 2003 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d versus UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d | patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction | open Follow-up duration: 30 d |
ASSENT 3, 2001 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d versus UFH 60 U/kg bolus, then 12 IU/kg per h for 48 h | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Follow-up duration: 30 d |
Baird, 2002 | Enoxaparin 40 mg TID, 4 d versus UFH 5000 IU bolus, then 30 000 IU over 24 h for 4d | patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy following acute myocardial infarction | 90-min TIMI flow Follow-up duration: 90 d |
ENTIRE-TIMI 2, 2002 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=8d versus UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d | Patients with ST-elevation MI presenting <6 hours from symptom onset were | open Follow-up duration: 30 d |
HART II, 2001 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=3d versus UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 15 IU/kg per hour for >=3d | patients undergoing reperfusion therapy with an accelerated recombinant tissue plasminogen activator regimen and aspirin for AMI | open Follow-up duration: 5–7 d |
fondaparinux versus placebo | |||
MICHELANGELO OASIS-6, 2006 NCT00064428 | fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily up to 8 days versus control (UFH or placebo) | patients with STEMI | double-blind Follow-up duration: 30 days 41 countries |
Hirudin versus heparin | |||
HIT-4, 1999 | Hirudin 0.2 mg/kg bolus; 0.5 mg/kg twice daily 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 5-7 days versus Placebo bolus, UFH 12 500 IU twice daily | patients with AMI <=6 h were treated with aspirin and streptokinase | double blind Follow-up duration: 30 days |
TIMI 9B, 1996 | Hirudin 0.1 mg/kg bolus; 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 96h versus UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion | Unstable angina or AMI | open Follow-up duration: 30 days |
phenprocoumon versus aspirin | |||
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs asp), 1980 | phenprocoumon versus aspirin 1.5 g daily | patients who had survived a myocardial infarction for 30-42 days | double blind Follow-up duration: 2 years |
phenprocoumon versus placebo | |||
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs pbo), 1980 | phenprocoumon versus placebo | patients who had survived a myocardial infarction for 30-42 days | double blind Follow-up duration: 2 years |
Reviparin versus placebo | |||
CREATE, 2005 | Reviparin 3436–6871 IU BID for 7 d (weight adjusted) versus placebo | patients with acute myocardial infarction, STEMI or new LBBB, <=12 h | Double-blind Follow-up duration: 30 d |
UFH versus no heparin | |||
ISIS-2 Pilot, 1987 | UFH nNo bolus, 1000 IU/h for 48 h versus No heparin | patients with suspected MI <=24 h | open Follow-up duration: In-hospital, 1 y (deat |
DUCCS, 1994 | UFH no bolus, 15 IU/kg per h for 4 d; target aPTT 50–90 s versus No heparin | patients with acute myocardial infarction four hours after APSAC administration, age <=85 y STEMI <=12 h | open Follow-up duration: 14 d |
UFH versus placebo | |||
ECSG, 1992 | UFH 5000 IU bolus, UFH 1000 IU/h for 48–120 h versus Placebo | patients treated with alteplase thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction, Age 21–70 y STEMI <=6h | Double-blind Follow-up duration: In-hospital |
OSIRIS, 1992 | UFH 10 000 IU bolus, 1000 IU/h for 24 h versus Placebo | STEMI w=6 h | Double-blind Follow-up duration: In-hospital |
warfarin versus aspirin | |||
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 | warfarin target INR 2.8-4.2
versus ASA 160mg/d | patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction | NA Follow-up duration: 48 months Norway |
warfarin versus control (on top of aspirin) | |||
WARIS, 1999 | warfarin 2.8–4.8 versus placebo | survivors of acute myocardial infarction | double blind Follow-up duration: 37 months |
APRICOT-2, 2002 | moderate-intensity coumarin target INR 2-3 (+aspirin)
versus aspirin | Acute MI after thrombolytics | open Follow-up duration: 3 months the Netherlands |
CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997 | warfarin fixed dose 3mg/d + 80 mg ASA
versus aspirin 160 mg/d | AMI | double blind Follow-up duration: 14 months North America |
CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 | warfarin 1mg/d + aspirin 80mg/d
versus aspirin 160 mg/d | patients who had had myocardial infarction | double blind Follow-up duration: 14 months North America |
CHAMP, 2002 | warfarin target INR 1.5-2.5 + aspirin 81 mg daily versus aspirin 162 mg/d | AMI (patients enrolled within 14 days of infarction) | open Follow-up duration: 2.7 years US |
LoWASA, 2004 | warfarin fixed dose 1.25mg/d + ASA 75mg/d versus aspirin alone | AMI | open Follow-up duration: 5 years Sweden |
WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 | warfarin target INR 2-2.5 +ASA 75mg/d versus ASA 160mg/d | patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction | open Follow-up duration: 4 years Norway |
Zibaeenezhad, 2004 | Warfarin target INR 2–3 +aspirin versus aspirin 100 mg/day | Acute MI | open Follow-up duration: 1 year |
warfarin versus placebo (on top of aspirin) | |||
Williams, 1997 | warfarin target INR 2–2.5 +aspirin
versus placebo +aspirin | Acute MI, unstable angina | double blind Follow-up duration: 2.5 months |
in first
in second