Related trials
ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo
dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
RADIANCE 1, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
ILLUSTRATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
FIELD, 2005 - fenofibrate vs placebo
LEADER, 2002 - bezafibrate vs placebo
DAIS, 2001 - fenofibrate vs placebo
HATS, 2001 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
BIP, 2000 - bezafibrate vs placebo
VA-HIT, 1999 - gemfibrozil vs placebo
SENDCAP, 1998 - bezafibrate vs placebo
LOCAT, 1997 - gemfibrozil vs placebo
BECAIT, 1996 - bezafibrate vs placebo
HHS (Frick)(secondary prev subgroup), 1993 - gemfibrozil vs placebo
Hanefeld, 1991 - clofibrate vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of HDL increasing drugs
All clinical trials of dalcetrapib
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
dalcetrapib 600 mg daily beginning 4 to 12 weeks after an index ACS event
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Concomittant treatment |
individualized, evidence-based programs for lowering their LDL cholesterol levels by means of statin therapy (if they did not have unacceptable side effects) and diet, with a target LDL cholesterol level of 2.6 mmol per liter or lower and preferably 1.8 mmol per liter or lower. |
Patients
Patients |
patients with recent acute coronary syndrome |
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
7938 / 7933 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double-blind |
Follow-up duration |
31 montsh (median) |
Premature discontinuation |
Premature discontinuation for futility |
Number of centre |
935 |
Geographic area |
27 countries |
Primary endpoint |
CV events |
Results
Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
|
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
CV events |
656 / 7938 (8,3%) |
633 / 7933 (8,0%) |
1,04 |
[0,93;1,15] |
|
Death from coronary heart disease |
118 / 7938 (1,5%) |
125 / 7933 (1,6%) |
0,94 |
[0,73;1,21] |
|
Nonfatal acute myocardial infarction |
414 / 7938 (5,2%) |
407 / 7933 (5,1%) |
1,02 |
[0,89;1,16] |
|
Hospitalization for unstable angina |
84 / 7938 (1,1%) |
92 / 7933 (1,2%) |
0,91 |
[0,68;1,22] |
|
Cardiac arrest with resuscitation |
14 / 7938 (0,2%) |
10 / 7933 (0,1%) |
1,40 |
[0,62;3,15] |
|
Stroke of presumed atherothrombotic cause |
91 / 7938 (1,1%) |
73 / 7933 (0,9%) |
1,25 |
[0,92;1,69] |
|
Death from any cause |
226 / 7938 (2,8%) |
229 / 7933 (2,9%) |
0,99 |
[0,82;1,18] |
|
Unanticipated coronary revascularization |
674 / 7938 (8,5%) |
672 / 7933 (8,5%) |
1,00 |
[0,90;1,11] |
|
Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
All cause death
226 / 7938
229 / 7933
0,99 [0,82;1,18]
cardiovascular events
656 / 7938
633 / 7933
1,04 [0,93;1,15]
Coronary death
118 / 7938
125 / 7933
0,94 [0,73;1,21]
Coronary revascularization
674 / 7938
672 / 7933
1,00 [0,90;1,11]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
91 / 7938
73 / 7933
1,25 [0,92;1,69]
Coronary event
656 / 7938
633 / 7933
1,04 [0,93;1,15]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
All cause death
|
226 / 7938 (2,8%) |
229 / 7933 (2,9%) |
0,99 |
[0,82;1,18] |
Death from any cause |
|
cardiovascular events
|
656 / 7938 (8,3%) |
633 / 7933 (8,0%) |
1,04 |
[0,93;1,15] |
CV events |
|
Coronary death
|
118 / 7938 (1,5%) |
125 / 7933 (1,6%) |
0,94 |
[0,73;1,21] |
Death from coronary heart disease |
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
91 / 7938 (1,1%) |
73 / 7933 (0,9%) |
1,25 |
[0,92;1,69] |
Stroke of presumed atherothrombotic cause |
|
Coronary revascularization
|
674 / 7938 (8,5%) |
672 / 7933 (8,5%) |
1,00 |
[0,90;1,11] |
Unanticipated coronary revascularization |
|
Coronary event
|
656 / 7938 (8,3%) |
633 / 7933 (8,0%) |
1,04 |
[0,93;1,15] |
CV events |
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 31 montsh (median))
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
All cause death |
2,85% |
2,89% |
-0,04%
|
cardiovascular events |
8,26% |
7,98% |
0,28%
|
Coronary death |
1,49% |
1,58% |
-0,09%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,15% |
9,20‰ |
0,23%
|
Coronary revascularization |
8,49% |
8,47% |
0,02%
|
Coronary event |
8,26% |
7,98% |
0,28%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
CEPT inhibition in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC12830
|
Trials register # |
NCT00658515
|
-
Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Holme IM, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJ, Shah PK, Tardif JC, Chaitman BR, Duttlinger-Maddux R, Mathieson J.
Rationale and design of the dal-OUTCOMES trial: efficacy and safety of dalcetrapib in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome..
Am Heart J 2009 Dec;158:896-901.e3
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Brumm J, Chaitman BR, Holme IM, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJ, Mundl H, Nicholls SJ, Shah PK, Tardif JC, Wright RS.
Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome..
N Engl J Med 2012 Nov 5;:
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1206797
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|