Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database in Heart and vessels Feedback    Home


Related trials

IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control

AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin

ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)

ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin

SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo

ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo

ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe

JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet

GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment

Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin

METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

Chello et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo

ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo

SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo

ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo

Patti et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo

MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control

FIELD, 2005 - fenofibrate vs placebo



See also:

  • All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
  • All clinical trials of lovastatin
  •  
     AFCAPS/TexCAPS study, 1998 TRC2586 
    download pdf: lovastatin | cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention

    Treatments

    Studied treatment lovastatin 20-40 mg/d
    Control treatment placebo
    Concomittant treatment diet
    Treatments description
    total cholesterol change -20% 
    LDL change -28% 
    HDL change +5.3% 

    Patients

    Patients men and women without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C levels and below-average high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels
    Inclusion criteria Men aged 45 to 73 years and postmenopausai women aged 55 to 73 years; no prior history, signs, or symptoms of definite myocardial infarction,angina,claudication, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack; TC between 180-264 mg/dL, LDL between 130-190 mg/dL, HDL <=45 mg/dL for mena and <=47 mg/dL for women and TG <=400 mg/dL or LDL between 125-129 mg/dl and ratio of TG/HDL >6
    Exclusion criteria uncontrolled hypertension, secondary hyperlipidemia, or type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus that was either managed with insulin or associated with a glycohemoglobin level of at least 10%
    Baseline characteristics
    Age (mean), yrs H: 57; F: 62 
    Women (%) 15 
    prior MI or CHD (%) 0% 
    Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 5.71 mmol/L 
    LDL (mmol/l) 3.89 mmol/L 
    HDL (mmol/l) 0.94 mmol/L 
    Triglycerides (mg/dl) 158 

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 3304 / 3301 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding double blind
    Follow-up duration 5.2 years
    Premature discontinuation Premature discontinuation for efficacy
    Number of centre 2
    Geographic area USA
    Hypothesis Superiority
    Primary endpoint major coronary event
    Remarks

    Remarks / Comments



    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    Coronary event

    163 / 3304
    215 / 3301
    0,76 [0,62;0,92]

    All cause death

    80 / 3304
    77 / 3301
    1,04 [0,76;1,41]

    Cardiovascular death

    17 / 3304
    25 / 3301
    0,68 [0,37;1,26]

    new-onset diabetes

    72 / 3094
    74 / 3117
    0,98 [0,71;1,35]

    Coronary death

    11 / 3304
    15 / 3301
    0,73 [0,34;1,59]

    stroke (fatal and non fatal)

    14 / 3304
    17 / 3301
    0,82 [0,41;1,67]

    Rhabdomyolysis

    1 / 3304
    2 / 3301
    classic 0,50 [0,05;5,51]

    Coronary death and non fatal MI

    163 / 3304
    215 / 3301
    0,76 [0,62;0,92]

    non cardiovascular death

    63 / 3304
    52 / 3301
    1,21 [0,84;1,74]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    Coronary event 163 / 3304 (4,9%) 215 / 3301 (6,5%) 0,76 [0,62;0,92]  
    All cause death 80 / 3304 (2,4%) 77 / 3301 (2,3%) 1,04 [0,76;1,41]  
    Cardiovascular death 17 / 3304 (0,5%) 25 / 3301 (0,8%) 0,68 [0,37;1,26]  
    new-onset diabetes 72 / 3094 (2,3%) 74 / 3117 (2,4%) 0,98 [0,71;1,35] sub group  12095
    Coronary death 11 / 3304 (0,3%) 15 / 3301 (0,5%) 0,73 [0,34;1,59]  
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 14 / 3304 (0,4%) 17 / 3301 (0,5%) 0,82 [0,41;1,67]  
    Rhabdomyolysis 1 / 3304 (0,0%) 2 / 3301 (0,1%) 0,50 [0,05;5,51]   18904
    Coronary death and non fatal MI 163 / 3304 (4,9%) 215 / 3301 (6,5%) 0,76 [0,62;0,92]  
    non cardiovascular death 63 / 3304 (1,9%) 52 / 3301 (1,6%) 1,21 [0,84;1,74]  
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:
  • 0:
  • 18904: Law M, Rudnicka ARStatin safety: a systematic review.Am J Cardiol 2006;97:52C-60C
  • 12095: Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, de Craen AJ, Seshasai SR, McMurray JJ, Freeman DJ, Jukema JW, Macfarlane PW, Packard CJ, Stott DJ, Westendorp RG, Shepherd J, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Marchioli R, Marfisi RM, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, TognonStatins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials.Lancet 2010 Feb 27;375:735-742

  • Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 5.2 years)
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    Coronary event 4,93% 6,51% -1,58%
    All cause death 2,42% 2,33% 0,09%
    Cardiovascular death 5,15‰ 7,57‰ -0,24%
    new-onset diabetes 2,33% 2,37% -0,05%
    Coronary death 3,33‰ 4,54‰ -0,12%
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 4,24‰ 5,15‰ -0,09%
    Rhabdomyolysis 0,30‰ 0,61‰ -0,03%
    Coronary death and non fatal MI 4,93% 6,51% -1,58%
    non cardiovascular death 1,91% 1,58% 0,33%

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for patients with LDL elevation and without CHD

    cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations

    cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention



    Reference(s)

    TrialResults-center ID TRC2586
    Trials register # NA
    • Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, Langendorfer A, Stein EA, Kruyer W, Gotto AM Jr,. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study.. JAMA 1998; 279:1615-22
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext
    • Cui Y, Watson DJ, Girman CJ, Shapiro DR, Gotto AM, Hiserote P, Clearfield MB. Effects of increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the incidence of first acute coronary events (from the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study).. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:829-34
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2016 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  Facebook  |  notify a friend

    100Heart and vessels