Related trials
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Chello et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Patti et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control
FIELD, 2005 - fenofibrate vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
All clinical trials of lovastatin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
lovastatin 20-40 mg/d
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Concomittant treatment |
diet
|
Treatments description |
total cholesterol change |
-20% |
LDL change |
-28% |
HDL change |
+5.3% |
|
Patients
Patients |
men and women without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C levels and below-average high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels |
Inclusion criteria |
Men aged 45 to 73 years and postmenopausai women aged 55 to 73 years; no prior history, signs, or symptoms of definite myocardial infarction,angina,claudication, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack; TC between 180-264 mg/dL, LDL between 130-190 mg/dL, HDL <=45 mg/dL for mena and <=47 mg/dL for women and TG <=400 mg/dL or LDL between 125-129 mg/dl and ratio of TG/HDL >6 |
Exclusion criteria |
uncontrolled hypertension, secondary hyperlipidemia, or type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus that was either managed with insulin or associated with a glycohemoglobin level of at least 10% |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
H: 57; F: 62 |
Women (%) |
15 |
prior MI or CHD (%) |
0% |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) |
5.71 mmol/L |
LDL (mmol/l) |
3.89 mmol/L |
HDL (mmol/l) |
0.94 mmol/L |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
158 |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
3304 / 3301 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
5.2 years |
Premature discontinuation |
Premature discontinuation for efficacy |
Number of centre |
2 |
Geographic area |
USA |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
major coronary event |
Remarks |
|
Remarks / Comments
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
163 / 3304
215 / 3301
0,76 [0,62;0,92]
All cause death
80 / 3304
77 / 3301
1,04 [0,76;1,41]
Cardiovascular death
17 / 3304
25 / 3301
0,68 [0,37;1,26]
new-onset diabetes
72 / 3094
74 / 3117
0,98 [0,71;1,35]
Coronary death
11 / 3304
15 / 3301
0,73 [0,34;1,59]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
14 / 3304
17 / 3301
0,82 [0,41;1,67]
Rhabdomyolysis
1 / 3304
2 / 3301
classic
0,50 [0,05;5,51]
Coronary death and non fatal MI
163 / 3304
215 / 3301
0,76 [0,62;0,92]
non cardiovascular death
63 / 3304
52 / 3301
1,21 [0,84;1,74]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event
|
163 / 3304 (4,9%) |
215 / 3301 (6,5%) |
0,76 |
[0,62;0,92] |
|
|
All cause death
|
80 / 3304 (2,4%) |
77 / 3301 (2,3%) |
1,04 |
[0,76;1,41] |
|
|
Cardiovascular death
|
17 / 3304 (0,5%) |
25 / 3301 (0,8%) |
0,68 |
[0,37;1,26] |
|
|
new-onset diabetes
|
72 / 3094 (2,3%) |
74 / 3117 (2,4%) |
0,98 |
[0,71;1,35] |
sub group |
12095 |
Coronary death
|
11 / 3304 (0,3%) |
15 / 3301 (0,5%) |
0,73 |
[0,34;1,59] |
|
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
14 / 3304 (0,4%) |
17 / 3301 (0,5%) |
0,82 |
[0,41;1,67] |
|
|
Rhabdomyolysis
|
1 / 3304 (0,0%) |
2 / 3301 (0,1%) |
0,50 |
[0,05;5,51] |
|
18904 |
Coronary death and non fatal MI
|
163 / 3304 (4,9%) |
215 / 3301 (6,5%) |
0,76 |
[0,62;0,92] |
|
|
non cardiovascular death
|
63 / 3304 (1,9%) |
52 / 3301 (1,6%) |
1,21 |
[0,84;1,74] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
18904: Law M, Rudnicka ARStatin safety: a systematic review.Am J Cardiol 2006;97:52C-60C
12095: Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, de Craen AJ, Seshasai SR, McMurray JJ, Freeman DJ, Jukema JW, Macfarlane PW, Packard CJ, Stott DJ, Westendorp RG, Shepherd J, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Marchioli R, Marfisi RM, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, TognonStatins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials.Lancet 2010 Feb 27;375:735-742
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 5.2 years)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event |
4,93% |
6,51% |
-1,58%
|
All cause death |
2,42% |
2,33% |
0,09%
|
Cardiovascular death |
5,15‰ |
7,57‰ |
-0,24%
|
new-onset diabetes |
2,33% |
2,37% |
-0,05%
|
Coronary death |
3,33‰ |
4,54‰ |
-0,12%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
4,24‰ |
5,15‰ |
-0,09%
|
Rhabdomyolysis |
0,30‰ |
0,61‰ |
-0,03%
|
Coronary death and non fatal MI |
4,93% |
6,51% |
-1,58%
|
non cardiovascular death |
1,91% |
1,58% |
0,33%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for patients with LDL elevation and without CHD
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC2586
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, Langendorfer A, Stein EA, Kruyer W, Gotto AM Jr,.
Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study..
JAMA 1998; 279:1615-22
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Cui Y, Watson DJ, Girman CJ, Shapiro DR, Gotto AM, Hiserote P, Clearfield MB.
Effects of increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the incidence of first acute coronary events (from the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study)..
Am J Cardiol 2009;104:829-34
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|