Related trials
ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
RADIANCE 1, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
ILLUSTRATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All post myocardial infarction clinical trials
All clinical trials of HDL increasing drugs
All clinical trials of gemfibrozil
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
gemfibrozil 1.2g daily
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Concomittant treatment |
diet |
Treatments description |
total cholesterol change |
-4% |
LDL change |
0% |
HDL change |
+6% |
|
Patients
Patients |
men with coronary heart disease, an HDL cholesterol level of 40 mg per deciliter (1.0 mmol per liter) or less, and an LDL cholesterol level of 140 mg per deciliter (3.6 mmol per liter) or less |
Inclusion criteria |
documented history of coronary heart disease (defined as a history of myocardial infarction, angina corroborated by objective evidence of ischemia, coronary revascularization, or angiographic evidence of stenosis greater than 50 percent of the luminal diameter in one or more major epicardial coronary arteries), age of less than 74 years, absence of serious coexisting conditions, HDL cholesterol level of 40 mg per deciliter (1.0 mmol per liter) or less, an LDL cholesterol level of 140 mg per deciliter (3.6 mmol per liter) or less, and a triglyceride level of 300 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) or less |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
64 |
Women (%) |
0 |
prior MI or CHD (%) |
100 |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) |
4.5 mmol/L |
LDL (mmol/l) |
2.9 mmol/L |
HDL (mmol/l) |
0.8 mmol/L |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
160.5 |
Diabetes(%) |
25% |
BMI (kg/m2) |
29 |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
1264 / 1267 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
5.1 years |
Number of centre |
20 |
Geographic area |
USA |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
nonfatal myocardial infarction or death from coronary causes |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
219 / 1264
275 / 1267
0,80 [0,68;0,94]
All cause death
198 / 1264
220 / 1267
0,90 [0,76;1,08]
cardiovascular events
258 / 1264
330 / 1267
0,78 [0,68;0,90]
Coronary death
93 / 1264
118 / 1267
0,79 [0,61;1,02]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
58 / 1264
76 / 1267
0,76 [0,55;1,07]
Non fatal MI
146 / 1264
184 / 1267
0,80 [0,65;0,97]
Death from cancer
45 / 1264
51 / 1267
0,88 [0,60;1,31]
Cancer
125 / 1264
138 / 1267
0,91 [0,72;1,14]
cardiac death
93 / 1264
118 / 1267
0,79 [0,61;1,02]
non cardiovascular death
102 / 1264
93 / 1267
1,10 [0,84;1,44]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event
|
219 / 1264 (17,3%) |
275 / 1267 (21,7%) |
0,80 |
[0,68;0,94] |
|
0 |
All cause death
|
198 / 1264 (15,7%) |
220 / 1267 (17,4%) |
0,90 |
[0,76;1,08] |
|
|
cardiovascular events
|
258 / 1264 (20,4%) |
330 / 1267 (26,0%) |
0,78 |
[0,68;0,90] |
|
12545 |
Coronary death
|
93 / 1264 (7,4%) |
118 / 1267 (9,3%) |
0,79 |
[0,61;1,02] |
|
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
58 / 1264 (4,6%) |
76 / 1267 (6,0%) |
0,76 |
[0,55;1,07] |
|
|
Non fatal MI
|
146 / 1264 (11,6%) |
184 / 1267 (14,5%) |
0,80 |
[0,65;0,97] |
|
|
Death from cancer
|
45 / 1264 (3,6%) |
51 / 1267 (4,0%) |
0,88 |
[0,60;1,31] |
|
|
Cancer
|
125 / 1264 (9,9%) |
138 / 1267 (10,9%) |
0,91 |
[0,72;1,14] |
|
|
cardiac death
|
93 / 1264 (7,4%) |
118 / 1267 (9,3%) |
0,79 |
[0,61;1,02] |
|
|
non cardiovascular death
|
102 / 1264 (8,1%) |
93 / 1267 (7,3%) |
1,10 |
[0,84;1,44] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
12545: Jun M, Foote C, Lv J, Neal B, Patel A, Nicholls SJ, Grobbee DE, Cass A, Chalmers J, Perkovic VEffects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet 2010 May 10;:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 5.1 years)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event |
17,33% |
21,70% |
-4,38%
|
All cause death |
15,66% |
17,36% |
-1,70%
|
cardiovascular events |
20,41% |
26,05% |
-5,63%
|
Coronary death |
7,36% |
9,31% |
-1,96%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
4,59% |
6,00% |
-1,41%
|
Non fatal MI |
11,55% |
14,52% |
-2,97%
|
Death from cancer |
3,56% |
4,03% |
-0,47%
|
Cancer |
9,89% |
10,89% |
-1,00%
|
cardiac death |
7,36% |
9,31% |
-1,96%
|
non cardiovascular death |
8,07% |
7,34% |
0,73%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for patients with prior MI or with CHD
cholesterol lowering intervention in post myocardial infarction for all type of patients
HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC2585
|
Trials register # |
NCT00283335
|
-
Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, Fye CL, Anderson JW, Elam MB, Faas FH, Linares E, Schaefer EJ, Schectman G, Wilt TJ, Wittes J,.
Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group..
N Engl J Med 1999; 341:410-8
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Adabag AS, Mithani S, Al Aloul B, Collins D, Bertog S, Bloomfield HE.
Efficacy of gemfibrozil in the primary prevention of atrial fibrillation in a large randomized controlled trial..
Am Heart J 2009 May;157:913-8
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|