Related trials
ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
ACCORD lipid (subgroup Eye study), 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
ILLUSTRATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All diabetes type 2 clinical trials
All clinical trials of HDL increasing drugs
All clinical trials of fenofibrate
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
fenofibrate on top simvastatin
160 mg per day adjusted according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate
|
Control treatment |
placebo (on top simvastatine)
|
Remarks |
participants were also randomized to either intensive or standard glycemic control and to either intensive or standard blood-pressure control. Glycemic-control ACCORD study was stopped early, in February 2008, because of higher mortality in the intensive-glycemic-control group. All patients were then transferred to a standard glycemia-control regimen |
Patients
Patients |
high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes |
Inclusion criteria |
type 2 diabetes; glycated hemoglobin level of 7.5% or more; LDL cholesterol level of 60 to 180 mg per deciliter; HDL cholesterol level below 55 mg per deciliter for women and blacks or below 50 mg per deciliter for all other groups, and a triglyceride level below 750 mg per deciliter if they were not receiving lipid therapy or below 400 mg per deciliter (4.5 mmol per liter) if they were receiving lipid therapy;
age between 40 to 79 y in case of evidence of clinical cardiovascular disease; |
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
2765 / 2753 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Factorial plan |
Blinding |
double-blind |
Follow-up duration |
4.7y |
Number of centre |
77 |
Geographic area |
United States and Canada |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
fatal cardiovascular events, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Cardiovascular death
99 / 2765
114 / 2753
0,86 [0,66;1,13]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
51 / 2765
48 / 2753
1,06 [0,72;1,56]
All cause death
203 / 2765
221 / 2753
0,91 [0,76;1,10]
cardiovascular events
291 / 2765
310 / 2753
0,93 [0,80;1,09]
Coronary event
332 / 2765
353 / 2753
0,94 [0,81;1,08]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
51 / 2765 (1,8%) |
48 / 2753 (1,7%) |
1,06 |
[0,72;1,56] |
|
|
cardiovascular events
|
291 / 2765 (10,5%) |
310 / 2753 (11,3%) |
0,93 |
[0,80;1,09] |
fatal and non ftala cardiovascular event |
|
All cause death
|
203 / 2765 (7,3%) |
221 / 2753 (8,0%) |
0,91 |
[0,76;1,10] |
|
|
Coronary event
|
332 / 2765 (12,0%) |
353 / 2753 (12,8%) |
0,94 |
[0,81;1,08] |
fatal coronary events, non fatla MI, unstable angina |
|
Cardiovascular death
|
99 / 2765 (3,6%) |
114 / 2753 (4,1%) |
0,86 |
[0,66;1,13] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 4.7y)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,84% |
1,74% |
0,10%
|
cardiovascular events |
10,52% |
11,26% |
-0,74%
|
All cause death |
7,34% |
8,03% |
-0,69%
|
Coronary event |
12,01% |
12,82% |
-0,82%
|
Cardiovascular death |
3,58% |
4,14% |
-0,56%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for diabetic patients
cholesterol lowering intervention in diabetes type 2 for diabetic patients with or withour hypercholesterolemia
HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
-
.
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus..
N Engl J Med 2010 Mar 14;:
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1001282
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
.
Effects of Medical Therapies on Retinopathy Progression in Type 2 Diabetes..
N Engl J Med 2010 Jun 29;:
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1001288
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA, Basile J, Calles J, Cohen RM, Cuddihy R, Cushman WC, Genuth S, Grimm RH Jr, Hamilton BP, Hoogwerf B, Karl D, Katz L, Krikorian A, O'Connor P, Pop-Busui R, Schubart U, Simmons D, Taylor H, Thomas A, Weiss D, Hramiak I.
Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial..
Lancet 2010 Jun 29;:
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60576-4
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|