Related trials
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control
ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Patti et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
Chello et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Vascular basis, 2005 - atorvastatin high dose vs lovastatin
WHI low fat, 2005 - diet vs usual diet
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All post myocardial infarction clinical trials
All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
All clinical trials of atorvastatin high dose
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
atorvastatin 80 mg daily
|
Control treatment |
pravastatin(40 mg)
|
Treatments description |
|
Patients
Patients |
Chronic coronary artery disease |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
72 |
LDL (mmol/l) |
3.78 |
Diabetes(%) |
23 |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
446 / 445 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
1 years |
Primary endpoint |
Total duration of ischemia onambulatoryECG |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
All cause death
6 / 446
18 / 445
0,33 [0,13;0,83]
Cardiovascular death
4 / 446
10 / 445
0,40 [0,13;1,26]
Coronary death
2 / 446
6 / 445
0,33 [0,07;1,64]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
1 / 446
3 / 445
classic
0,33 [0,03;3,19]
MACE
36 / 446
50 / 445
0,72 [0,48;1,08]
Non fatal MI
16 / 446
17 / 445
0,94 [0,48;1,84]
Rhabdomyolysis
0 / 446
0 / 445
classic
1,00 [0,00;254,66]
Death from cancer
0 / 446
2 / 445
classic
0,11 [0,00;6,89]
Myopathy
0 / 446
0 / 445
classic
1,00 [0,00;254,66]
Coronary death and non fatal MI
22 / 446
27 / 445
0,81 [0,47;1,41]
Adverse events
48 / 446
46 / 445
1,04 [0,71;1,53]
non cardiovascular death
2 / 446
6 / 445
0,33 [0,07;1,64]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
All cause death
|
6 / 446 (1,3%) |
18 / 445 (4,0%) |
0,33 |
[0,13;0,83] |
12 months |
|
Cardiovascular death
|
4 / 446 (0,9%) |
10 / 445 (2,2%) |
0,40 |
[0,13;1,26] |
|
|
Coronary death
|
2 / 446 (0,4%) |
6 / 445 (1,3%) |
0,33 |
[0,07;1,64] |
|
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
1 / 446 (0,2%) |
3 / 445 (0,7%) |
0,33 |
[0,03;3,19] |
|
|
MACE
|
36 / 446 (8,1%) |
50 / 445 (11,2%) |
0,72 |
[0,48;1,08] |
MACE (with hospitalization for unstable nagina) |
|
Non fatal MI
|
16 / 446 (3,6%) |
17 / 445 (3,8%) |
0,94 |
[0,48;1,84] |
|
|
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0 / 446 (0,1%) |
0 / 445 (0,1%) |
1,00 |
[0,02;50,18] |
|
|
Death from cancer
|
0 / 446 (0,1%) |
2 / 445 (0,4%) |
0,25 |
[0,01;5,52] |
|
|
Myopathy
|
0 / 446 (0,1%) |
0 / 445 (0,1%) |
1,00 |
[0,02;50,18] |
|
0 |
Coronary death and non fatal MI
|
22 / 446 (4,9%) |
27 / 445 (6,1%) |
0,81 |
[0,47;1,41] |
|
|
Adverse events
|
48 / 446 (10,8%) |
46 / 445 (10,3%) |
1,04 |
[0,71;1,53] |
|
|
non cardiovascular death
|
2 / 446 (0,4%) |
6 / 445 (1,3%) |
0,33 |
[0,07;1,64] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 1 years)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
All cause death |
1,35% |
4,04% |
-2,70%
|
Cardiovascular death |
8,97‰ |
2,25% |
-1,35%
|
Coronary death |
4,48‰ |
1,35% |
-0,90%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
2,24‰ |
6,74‰ |
-0,45%
|
MACE |
8,07% |
11,24% |
-3,16%
|
Non fatal MI |
3,59% |
3,82% |
-0,23%
|
Coronary death and non fatal MI |
4,93% |
6,07% |
-1,13%
|
Adverse events |
10,76% |
10,34% |
0,43%
|
non cardiovascular death |
4,48‰ |
1,35% |
-0,90%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for patients with prior MI or with CHD
cholesterol lowering intervention in post myocardial infarction for all type of patients
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC6977
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Deedwania P, Stone PH, Bairey Merz CN, Cosin-Aguilar J, Koylan N, Luo D, Ouyang P, Piotrowicz R, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Sellier P, Stein JH, Thompson PL, Tzivoni D.
Effects of intensive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy on myocardial ischemia in older patients with coronary heart disease: results of the Study Assessing Goals in the Elderly (SAGE)..
Circulation 2007;115:700-7
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|