Related trials
ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 High dose, 2013 - edoxaban vs warfarin standard dose
ADOPT, 2011 - apixaban vs enoxaparin
AVERROES, 2011 - apixaban vs aspirin
ARISTOTLE, 2011 - apixaban vs warfarin standard dose
ADVANCE 2, 2010 - apixaban vs enoxaparin (europe regimen)
ROCKET-AF, 2010 - rivaroxaban vs warfarin standard dose
ADVANCE 3, 2010 - apixaban vs enoxaparin
ACTIVE A, 2009 - aspirin + clopidogrel vs aspirin
RE-LY (150mg), 2009 - dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose
RECORD 4, 2009 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin (US regimen)
RE-LY (110mg), 2009 - dabigatran 110mg vs warfarin standard dose
WATCH (warfarin vs aspirin), 2009 - warfarin vs aspirin
Lip (phase 2 AZD0837), 2009 - AZD0837 vs warfarin standard dose
RECORD 2, 2008 - rivaroxaban (long duration) vs enoxaparin (short duration)
RE-MOBILIZE (220mg), 2008 - dabigatran 220mg vs enoxaparin (US regimen)
ADVANCE-1, 2008 - apixaban vs enoxaparin (US regimen)
RECORD 1, 2008 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin
AMADEUS, 2008 - idraparinux vs warfarin standard dose
RE-MOBILIZE (150mg), 2008 - dabigatran 150mg vs enoxaparin (US regimen)
RECORD 3, 2008 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin (europe regimen)
APROPOS 2.5mg, 2007 - apixaban vs enoxaparin (US regimen)
RE-NOVATE (150mg), 2007 - dabigatran 150mg vs enoxaparin
RE-MODEL (150mg), 2007 - dabigatran 150mg vs enoxaparin (europe regimen)
PETRO (150mg), 2007 - dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose
RE-NOVATE (220mg), 2007 - dabigatran 220mg vs enoxaparin
See also:
All atrial fibrillation clinical trials
All clinical trials of antithrombotics
All clinical trials of triflusal+coumadin medium dose
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
Triflusal 600 mg/d + coumadin medium dose (target INR 1.25-2)
The antiplatelet agent used was triflusal (Grupo Uriach,Spain), a drug structurally related to acetylsalicylic acid ,of which clinical trials showed that 600 mg/day has similar
biologic effects and clinical efficacy to aspirin 300 mg/day with fewer bleeding complications. The anticoagulant used was acenocoumarol (Novartis Farmaceutica,Spain), the coumarin derivative most used in several European countries.
|
Control treatment |
Triflusal 600 mg/d
The antiplatelet agent used was triflusal (Grupo Uriach,Spain), a drug structurally related to acetylsalicylic acid ,of which clinical trials showed that 600 mg/day has similar
biologic effects and clinical efficacy to aspirin 300 mg/day with fewer bleeding complications.
|
Patients
Patients |
Non valvular atrial fibrillation.
Intermediate risk patients |
Inclusion criteria |
Eligible patients were divided in two
groups: the high-risk group included nonvalvular plus prior
embolism and patients with mitral stenosis with and without
prior embolism. All others were included in the intermediate-risk group.
|
Exclusion criteria |
Patients at low
risk according to Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
(SPAF) III stratification or younger than 60 years of age were not included.Exclusion criteria were mechanical valve prosthesis, stroke in the previous six months, serum
creatinine over 3 mg/dl, alcoholism or drug addiction,
severe uncontrolled hypertension, diffuse arteriosclerosis,
and indication for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or
indication/contraindication for antiplatelet or anticoagulant
therapy.
|
Baseline characteristics |
age(mean) |
69.88 |
male(%) |
57.2 |
systolic blood pressure(mean) |
137.01 |
diastolic blood pressure(mean) |
79.51 |
hypertension(%) |
43.93 |
diabete mellitus(%) |
15.87 |
paroxysmal AF(%) |
8.42 |
left atrial dimension(mean in mm) |
46.59 |
heart failure(%) |
10.86 |
current smoker(%) |
38.78 |
subgroup test |
c |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
235 / 242 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
Open |
Follow-up duration |
2.76 years |
Lost to follow-up |
4.19% |
Number of centre |
13 |
Geographic area |
Spain |
Hypothesis |
superiority |
Primary endpoint |
vascular death,TIA,nonfatal stroke or systemic embolism |
Remarks |
Withdrawals from study treatments are not reported separetely:9% were withdrawn for adverse events without significant difference among groups,9.3% were withdrawn secondary to gp or patient's decision. |
Withdrawals (T1/T0) |
nr / nr |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic)
3 / 222
15 / 235
0,21 [0,06;0,72]
systemic thrombo-embolic complication
0 / 222
1 / 235
classic
0,21 [0,00;15,45]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
3 / 222
11 / 235
0,29 [0,08;1,02]
myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)
0 / 222
1 / 235
classic
0,21 [0,00;15,45]
All cause death
6 / 222
15 / 235
0,42 [0,17;1,07]
Major bleeding
5 / 222
2 / 235
classic
2,65 [0,52;13,50]
Minor bleeding
16 / 222
5 / 235
classic
3,39 [1,26;9,09]
Haemmorhagic stroke
1 / 222
2 / 235
classic
0,53 [0,05;5,80]
Fatal bleeding
1 / 222
0 / 235
classic
5,29 [0,07;386,28]
Cardiovascular death
2 / 222
8 / 235
0,26 [0,06;1,23]
Fatal stroke
0 / 222
1 / 235
classic
0,21 [0,00;15,45]
TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism
3 / 222
15 / 235
0,21 [0,06;0,72]
Non fatal stroke
3 / 222
10 / 235
0,32 [0,09;1,14]
intracranial hemorrhage
1 / 222
2 / 235
classic
0,53 [0,05;5,80]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic)
|
3 / 222 (1,4%) |
15 / 235 (6,4%) |
0,21 |
[0,06;0,72] |
|
|
systemic thrombo-embolic complication
|
0 / 222 (0,2%) |
1 / 235 (0,4%) |
0,53 |
[0,02;15,70] |
abrupt vascular insufficiency without previous clinical symptoms |
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
3 / 222 (1,4%) |
11 / 235 (4,7%) |
0,29 |
[0,08;1,02] |
focal neurologic deficit lasting more than 24 hours,the ischemic or hemorrhagic etiology was defined by neuroimaging |
|
myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)
|
0 / 222 (0,2%) |
1 / 235 (0,4%) |
0,53 |
[0,02;15,70] |
|
|
All cause death
|
6 / 222 (2,7%) |
15 / 235 (6,4%) |
0,42 |
[0,17;1,07] |
|
|
Major bleeding
|
5 / 222 (2,3%) |
2 / 235 (0,9%) |
2,65 |
[0,52;13,50] |
bleeding requiring hospital admission, blood transfusion or surgery (intracranial and intracerebral bleeding included) |
|
Minor bleeding
|
16 / 222 (7,2%) |
5 / 235 (2,1%) |
3,39 |
[1,26;9,09] |
|
|
Haemmorhagic stroke
|
1 / 222 (0,5%) |
2 / 235 (0,9%) |
0,53 |
[0,05;5,80] |
|
|
Fatal bleeding
|
1 / 222 (0,5%) |
0 / 235 (0,2%) |
2,12 |
[0,07;62,80] |
|
|
Cardiovascular death
|
2 / 222 (0,9%) |
8 / 235 (3,4%) |
0,26 |
[0,06;1,23] |
either sudden or any other death occuring within 30 days after a vascular event or progressive heart failure |
|
Fatal stroke
|
0 / 222 (0,2%) |
1 / 235 (0,4%) |
0,53 |
[0,02;15,70] |
|
|
TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism
|
3 / 222 (1,4%) |
15 / 235 (6,4%) |
0,21 |
[0,06;0,72] |
thrombo-embolic event, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism |
|
Non fatal stroke
|
3 / 222 (1,4%) |
10 / 235 (4,3%) |
0,32 |
[0,09;1,14] |
|
|
intracranial hemorrhage
|
1 / 222 (0,5%) |
2 / 235 (0,9%) |
0,53 |
[0,05;5,80] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 2.76 years)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) |
1,35% |
6,38% |
-5,03%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,35% |
4,68% |
-3,33%
|
All cause death |
2,70% |
6,38% |
-3,68%
|
Major bleeding |
2,25% |
8,51‰ |
1,4%
|
Minor bleeding |
7,21% |
2,13% |
5,1%
|
Haemmorhagic stroke |
4,50‰ |
8,51‰ |
-0,40%
|
Cardiovascular death |
9,01‰ |
3,40% |
-2,50%
|
TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism |
1,35% |
6,38% |
-5,03%
|
Non fatal stroke |
1,35% |
4,26% |
-2,90%
|
intracranial hemorrhage |
4,50‰ |
8,51‰ |
-0,40%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
antithrombotics in atrial fibrillation for primary prevention of thromboembolic events
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC2653
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Perez-Gomez F, Alegria E, Berjon J, Iriarte JA, Zumalde J, Salvador A, Mataix L.
Comparative effects of antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or combined therapy in patients with valvular and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized multicenter study..
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 Oct 19;44:1557-66
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|