Related trials
ATOLL, 2010 - enoxaparin vs standard heparin
TRA-PCI, 2009 - SCH 530348 vs placebo
NAPLES (Tavano), 2009 - bivalirudin vs actionated heparin plus tirofiban
CHAMPION-PCI, 2009 - cangrelor up front vs clopidogrel up front
CHAMPION-PLATFORM, 2009 - cangrelor up front vs delayed clopidogrel
HORIZONS-AMI (Stone), 2008 - bivalirudin vs heparin + GP2b3a inhibitors
ISAR-REACT 3, 2008 - bivalirudin vs UFH
Hull, 2006 - extended tinzaparin vs standard treatment
INTERACT, 2006 - enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin)
Deitcher, 2006 - extended enoxaparin vs standard treatment
ACUITY (Stone) (bivalirudin alone), 2006 - bivalirudin vs heparin + GP2b3a inhibitors
STEEPLE, 2006 - enoxaparin vs UFH
EVET, 2005 - enoxaparin vs tinzaparin
Wells (subgroup), 2005 - tinzaparin vs dalteparin
Daskalopoulos, 2005 - LMWH at home vs UFH in hospital
Chong, 2005 - LMWH at home vs UFH in hospital
JUMBO-TIMI 26, 2005 - prasugrel vs clopidogrel
REPLACE-1, 2004 - bivalirudin vs UFH
Ramacciotti, 2004 - LMWH at home vs UFH in hospital
THE-PRINCE (Kleber), 2003 - enoxaparin vs UFH
REPLACE-2, 2003 - bivalirudin vs hepatin + anti Gp2b3a
Natarajan (without antiGp2b3a), 2003 - Dalteparin vs UFH
Cesarone, 2003 - extended enoxaparin vs standard treatment
CRUISE, 2003 - Enoxaparin vs UFH
Natarajan (+ antiGp2b3a), 2003 - Dalteparin vs UFH + anti Gp2b3a
See also:
All percutaneous coronary intervention clinical trials
All clinical trials of antithrombotics
All clinical trials of bivalirudin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
Bivalirudin
bivalirudin intravenous
bolus of 0.75 mg per kilogram, followed by an infusion
of 1.75 mg per kilogram per hour
|
Control treatment |
Heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor
heparin intravenous bolus of 60 IU per kilogram
of body weight, with subsequent boluses targeted
to an activated clotting time of 200 to 250 seconds
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was
administered before PCI in all the patients in the
control group but was to be administered in the
bivalirudin group only in patients with no reflow
or with giant thrombus after PCI. Either abciximab
(a bolus of 0.25 mg per kilogram followed
by an infusion of 0.125 �g per kilogram per minute;
maximum dose, 10 �g per minute) or doublebolus
eptifibatide (a bolus of 180 �g per kilogram
followed by an infusion of 2.0 �g per kilogram
per minute, with a second bolus given 10 minutes
after the first; no maximum dose prespecified),
adjusted for renal impairment according to the
label, was permitted at the discretion of the investigator
and was continued for 12 hours (abciximab)
or 12 to 18 hours (eptifibatide)
|
Concomittant treatment |
Aspirin (324 mg given orally or 500 mg administered
intravenously) was given in the emergency
room, after which 300 to 325 mg was given orally
every day during the hospitalization, and 75 to
81 mg every day thereafter indefinitely. A loading
dose of clopidogrel (either 300 mg or 600 mg, at
the discretion of the investigator), or ticlopidine
(500 mg), in the case of allergy to clopidogrel, was
administered before catheterization, followed by
75 mg orally every day for at least 6 months (1 year
or longer recommended) |
Treatments description |
Bivalirudin as Antithrombin during PCI |
96.9% / 0.2% |
stent implanted (%) |
95.5% |
|
Patients
Patients |
patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
who presented within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and who were
undergoing primary PCI |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), years |
60.2 y |
male (%) |
76.6% |
Previous PCI |
10.7% |
Previous CABG |
2.95% |
Weight (kg) |
80 kg |
Hypertension (%) |
53.5% |
Left anterior descending coronary artery |
40.7% |
Left circumfl ex coronary artery |
15.8% |
Right coronary artery |
42% |
Unstable angina / ACS |
0% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
1800 / 1802 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
open |
Follow-up duration |
30 days |
Number of centre |
123 |
Geographic area |
11 countries |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
MACE, major bleeding |
Results
Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
|
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Major adverse cardiovascular events |
98 / 1800 (5,4%) |
99 / 1802 (5,5%) |
0,99 |
[0,76;1,30] |
|
Death |
37 / 1800 (2,1%) |
56 / 1802 (3,1%) |
0,66 |
[0,44;1,00] |
|
Cardiac death |
32 / 1800 (1,8%) |
52 / 1802 (2,9%) |
0,62 |
[0,40;0,95] |
|
Noncardiac death |
5 / 1800 (0,3%) |
4 / 1802 (0,2%) |
1,25 |
[0,34;4,65] |
|
Reinfarction |
33 / 1800 (1,8%) |
32 / 1802 (1,8%) |
1,03 |
[0,64;1,67] |
|
Q-wave Reinfarction |
25 / 1800 (1,4%) |
22 / 1802 (1,2%) |
1,14 |
[0,64;2,01] |
|
Non�Q-wave Reinfarction |
8 / 1800 (0,4%) |
12 / 1802 (0,7%) |
0,67 |
[0,27;1,63] |
|
Revascularization of target vessel for ischemia |
47 / 1800 (2,6%) |
35 / 1802 (1,9%) |
1,34 |
[0,87;2,07] |
|
Stroke |
13 / 1800 (0,7%) |
11 / 1802 (0,6%) |
1,18 |
[0,53;2,63] |
|
Major bleeding, non�CABG-related |
89 / 1800 (4,9%) |
149 / 1802 (8,3%) |
0,60 |
[0,46;0,77] |
|
Major bleeding, including CABG-related |
122 / 1800 (6,8%) |
195 / 1802 (10,8%) |
0,63 |
[0,50;0,78] |
|
Blood transfusion |
37 / 1800 (2,1%) |
63 / 1802 (3,5%) |
0,59 |
[0,39;0,88] |
|
|
Not calculable (data not available) |
TIMI Major bleeding |
55 / 1800 (3,1%) |
91 / 1802 (5,0%) |
0,61 |
[0,44;0,84] |
|
TIMI Minor bleeding |
51 / 1800 (2,8%) |
82 / 1802 (4,6%) |
0,62 |
[0,44;0,88] |
|
TIMI Major or minor bleeding |
106 / 1800 (5,9%) |
173 / 1802 (9,6%) |
0,61 |
[0,49;0,77] |
|
|
Not calculable (data not available) |
Life-threatening or severe bleeding (GUSTO classification) |
8 / 1800 (0,4%) |
11 / 1802 (0,6%) |
0,73 |
[0,29;1,81] |
|
Moderate bleeding (GUSTO classification) |
55 / 1800 (3,1%) |
91 / 1802 (5,0%) |
0,61 |
[0,44;0,84] |
|
Life-threatening, severe, or moderate bleeding (GUSTO classification) |
63 / 1800 (3,5%) |
101 / 1802 (5,6%) |
0,62 |
[0,46;0,85] |
|
|
Not calculable (data not available) |
ModerateThrombocytopenia (<100,000 platelets/mm3) |
19 / 1800 (1,1%) |
48 / 1802 (2,7%) |
0,40 |
[0,23;0,67] |
|
SevereThrombocytopenia (<50,000 platelets/mm3) |
5 / 1800 (0,3%) |
15 / 1802 (0,8%) |
0,33 |
[0,12;0,92] |
|
Profound Thrombocytopenia (<20,000 platelets/mm3) |
0 / 1800 (0,0%) |
6 / 1802 (0,3%) |
0,08 |
[0,00;1,49] |
|
Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
net benefit
166 / 1800
218 / 1802
0,76 [0,63;0,92]
Bleeding
89 / 1800
149 / 1802
0,60 [0,46;0,77]
death, MI, unplanned revascularization
98 / 1800
99 / 1802
0,99 [0,76;1,30]
MI (fatal and non fatal)
25 / 1800
22 / 1802
classic
1,14 [0,64;2,01]
Minor bleeding
51 / 1800
82 / 1802
0,62 [0,44;0,88]
MACE
98 / 1800
99 / 1802
0,99 [0,76;1,30]
Major bleeding
55 / 1800
91 / 1802
0,61 [0,44;0,84]
All cause death
37 / 1800
56 / 1802
0,66 [0,44;1,00]
Unplanned revascularisation for ischaemia
47 / 1800
35 / 1802
classic
1,34 [0,87;2,07]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
net benefit
|
166 / 1800 (9,2%) |
218 / 1802 (12,1%) |
0,76 |
[0,63;0,92] |
|
9464 |
Bleeding
|
89 / 1800 (4,9%) |
149 / 1802 (8,3%) |
0,60 |
[0,46;0,77] |
Major bleeding, non�CABG-related |
|
death, MI, unplanned revascularization
|
98 / 1800 (5,4%) |
99 / 1802 (5,5%) |
0,99 |
[0,76;1,30] |
Major adverse cardiovascular events |
|
MI (fatal and non fatal)
|
25 / 1800 (1,4%) |
22 / 1802 (1,2%) |
1,14 |
[0,64;2,01] |
Q-wave Reinfarction |
|
Minor bleeding
|
51 / 1800 (2,8%) |
82 / 1802 (4,6%) |
0,62 |
[0,44;0,88] |
TIMI Minor bleeding |
|
MACE
|
98 / 1800 (5,4%) |
99 / 1802 (5,5%) |
0,99 |
[0,76;1,30] |
Major adverse cardiovascular events |
|
Major bleeding
|
55 / 1800 (3,1%) |
91 / 1802 (5,0%) |
0,61 |
[0,44;0,84] |
TIMI Major bleeding |
|
All cause death
|
37 / 1800 (2,1%) |
56 / 1802 (3,1%) |
0,66 |
[0,44;1,00] |
Death |
|
Unplanned revascularisation for ischaemia
|
47 / 1800 (2,6%) |
35 / 1802 (1,9%) |
1,34 |
[0,87;2,07] |
Revascularization of target vessel for ischemia |
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
9464: Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, Kornowski R, Hartmann F, Gersh BJ, Pocock SJ, Dangas G, Wong SC, Kirtane AJ, Parise H, Mehran RBivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med 2008 May 22;358:2218-30
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
net benefit |
9,22% |
12,10% |
-28,8‰
|
Bleeding |
4,94% |
8,27% |
-33,2‰
|
death, MI, unplanned revascularization |
5,44% |
5,49% |
-0,5‰
|
MI (fatal and non fatal) |
1,39% |
1,22% |
1,7‰
|
Minor bleeding |
2,83% |
4,55% |
-17,2‰
|
MACE |
5,44% |
5,49% |
-0,5‰
|
Major bleeding |
3,06% |
5,05% |
-19,9‰
|
All cause death |
2,06% |
3,11% |
-10,5‰
|
Unplanned revascularisation for ischaemia |
2,61% |
1,94% |
6,7‰
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
anticoagulant in percutaneous coronary intervention for all type of patients
antithrombotics in percutaneous coronary intervention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
-
Mehran R, Brodie B, Cox DA, Grines CL, Rutherford B, Bhatt DL, Dangas G, Feit F, Ohman EM, Parise H, Fahy M, Lansky AJ, Stone GW, .
The Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) Trial: study design and rationale..
Am Heart J 2008;156:44-56.
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.02.008
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, Kornowski R, Hartmann F, Gersh BJ, Pocock SJ, Dangas G, Wong SC, Kirtane AJ, Parise H, Mehran R.
Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction..
N Engl J Med 2008 May 22;358:2218-30
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|