Related trials
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control
HYRIM, 2005 - fluvastatin vs placebo
PHYLLIS, 2004 - pravastatin vs placebo
CARDS, 2004 - atorvastatin vs placebo
ALERT, 2003 - fluvastatin vs placebo
ASCOT, 2003 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Mohler, 2003 - atorvastatin vs placebo
HPS (primary prevention sub group), 2003 - simvastatin vs placebo
FAST Fukuoka pravastatin, 2002 - pravastatin vs control
PROSPER (primary prevention subgroup), 2002 - pravastatin vs placebo
ALLHAT, 2002 - pravastatin vs usual care
BCAPS, 2001 - fluvastatin vs placebo
KLIS, 2000 - pravastatin vs usual care
AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998 - lovastatin vs placebo
CAIUS, 1996 - pravastatin vs placebo
WOSCOPS, 1995 - pravastatin vs placebo
KAPS, 1995 - pravastatin vs placebo
ACAPS, 1994 - lovastatin vs placebo
PMSG, 1993 - pravastatin vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
All clinical trials of atorvastatin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
atorvastatin 10mg
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Treatments description |
total cholesterol change |
-19.8% |
LDL change |
-30.5% |
HDL change |
+1.9% |
|
Patients
Patients |
subjects with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels below contemporary guideline targets; primary prevention subgroup |
Inclusion criteria |
male and female subjects, aged 40�75 years, type 2 diabetes by the World; Health Organization definition (17) 3 years before screening. LDL cholesterol criteria were 1) LDL cholesterol <=140 mg/dl (3.6 mmol/l) if subjects had documented myocardial infarction or an interventional procedure >=3 months before screening or 2) LDL cholesterol <=160 mg/dl (4.1 mmol/l) if not. Triglyceride levels were required to be >=600 mg/dl (6.8 mmol/l) at all visits. |
Exclusion criteria |
diabetes; myocardial infarction, interventional procedure, or episodes of unstable angina3 months before screening; HbA1c (A1C) 10%; active liver disease or hepatic dysfunction (aspartate or alanine aminotransferase levels 1.5 the upper limit of normal); severe renal dysfunction or nephrotic syndrome; congestive heart failure treated with digoxin; creatine phosphokinase 3 the upper limit of normal; blood pressure 160/100 mmHg; BMI35 kg/m2; abuse of alcohol and/or drugs; hypersensitivity to the study medication;placebo run-in compliance rate 80%; current or planned pregnancy; or use of excluded medications |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
61y (range 40-75) |
Women (%) |
38% |
prior MI or CHD (%) |
0% |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) |
5.0 mmol/l |
LDL (mmol/l) |
3.0 mmol/l |
HDL (mmol/l) |
1.2 mmol/L |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
1.6 mmol/l |
Diabetes(%) |
100% |
BMI (kg/m2) |
28.9 |
Stroke history |
5% |
History of hypertension (%) |
52% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
959 / 947 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
4 year |
Number of centre |
70 |
Geographic area |
14 countries |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
cardiovascular events |
Remarks |
|
Remarks / Comments
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
100 / 959
102 / 946
0,97 [0,75;1,26]
All cause death
44 / 959
41 / 946
1,06 [0,70;1,60]
Cardiovascular death
24 / 959
19 / 946
classic
1,25 [0,69;2,26]
cardiovascular events
100 / 959
102 / 946
0,97 [0,75;1,26]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
27 / 959
29 / 946
0,92 [0,55;1,54]
non cardiovascular death
20 / 959
22 / 946
0,90 [0,49;1,63]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event
|
100 / 959 (10,4%) |
102 / 946 (10,8%) |
0,97 |
[0,75;1,26] |
|
11051 |
All cause death
|
44 / 959 (4,6%) |
41 / 946 (4,3%) |
1,06 |
[0,70;1,60] |
|
11048 |
Cardiovascular death
|
24 / 959 (2,5%) |
19 / 946 (2,0%) |
1,25 |
[0,69;2,26] |
|
11051 |
cardiovascular events
|
100 / 959 (10,4%) |
102 / 946 (10,8%) |
0,97 |
[0,75;1,26] |
|
11051 |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
27 / 959 (2,8%) |
29 / 946 (3,1%) |
0,92 |
[0,55;1,54] |
|
11048 |
non cardiovascular death
|
20 / 959 (2,1%) |
22 / 946 (2,3%) |
0,90 |
[0,49;1,63] |
|
11051 |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
11048: Brugts JJ, Yetgin T, Hoeks SE, Gotto AM, Shepherd J, Westendorp RG, de Craen AJ, Knopp RH, Nakamura H, Ridker P, van Domburg R, Deckers JWThe benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ 2009 Jun 30;338:b2376
11051: Knopp RH, d'Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJEfficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN).Diabetes Care 2006;29:1478-85
0:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 4 year)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event |
10,43% |
10,78% |
-0,35%
|
All cause death |
4,59% |
4,33% |
0,25%
|
Cardiovascular death |
2,50% |
2,01% |
0,49%
|
cardiovascular events |
10,43% |
10,78% |
-0,35%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
2,82% |
3,07% |
-0,25%
|
non cardiovascular death |
2,09% |
2,33% |
-0,24%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC9788
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Knopp RH, d'Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJ.
Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN)..
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1478-85
- 10.2337/dc05-2415
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|