| 
 
		
		Related trials
		 
				 JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
				 MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin  vs control 
				 HYRIM, 2005 - fluvastatin  vs placebo 
				 PHYLLIS, 2004 - pravastatin  vs placebo 
				 CARDS, 2004 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ALERT, 2003 - fluvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ASCOT, 2003 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
				 Mohler, 2003 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
				 HPS (primary prevention sub group), 2003 - simvastatin  vs placebo 
				 FAST Fukuoka  pravastatin, 2002 - pravastatin  vs control 
				 PROSPER (primary prevention subgroup), 2002 - pravastatin  vs placebo 
				 ALLHAT, 2002 - pravastatin  vs usual care 
				 BCAPS, 2001 - fluvastatin  vs placebo 
				 KLIS, 2000 - pravastatin  vs usual care 
				 AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998 - lovastatin  vs placebo 
				 CAIUS, 1996 - pravastatin  vs placebo 
				 WOSCOPS, 1995 - pravastatin  vs placebo 
				 KAPS, 1995 - pravastatin  vs placebo 
				 ACAPS, 1994 - lovastatin  vs placebo 
				 PMSG, 1993 - pravastatin  vs placebo 
 
 
		See also:
		All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
				
			
		
			
			All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention 
			
		
		
			
			All clinical trials of atorvastatin |  | 
	Treatments
	
		| Studied treatment | atorvastatin 10mg 
 |  
		| Control treatment | placebo 
 |  | Treatments description | 
						
						| total cholesterol change | -19.8% |  
						| LDL change | -30.5% |  
						| HDL change | +1.9% |  |  Patients
		
			| Patients | subjects with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels below contemporary guideline targets; primary prevention subgroup |  
			| Inclusion criteria | male and female subjects, aged 4075 years, type 2 diabetes by the World; Health Organization definition (17) 3 years before screening. LDL cholesterol criteria were 1) LDL cholesterol =3 months before screening or 2) LDL cholesterol =600 mg/dl (6.8 mmol/l) at all visits. |  
			| Exclusion criteria | diabetes; myocardial infarction, interventional procedure, or episodes of unstable angina3 months before screening; HbA1c (A1C) 10%; active liver disease or hepatic dysfunction (aspartate or alanine aminotransferase levels 1.5  the upper limit of normal); severe renal dysfunction or nephrotic syndrome; congestive heart failure treated with digoxin; creatine phosphokinase 3  the upper limit of normal; blood pressure 160/100 mmHg; BMI35 kg/m2; abuse of alcohol and/or drugs; hypersensitivity to the study medication;placebo run-in compliance rate 80%; current or planned pregnancy; or use of excluded medications |  | Baseline characteristics | 
						
							| Age (mean), yrs | 61y (range 40-75) |  
							| Women (%) | 38% |  
							| prior MI or CHD (%) | 0% |  
							| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 5.0 mmol/l |  
							| LDL (mmol/l) | 3.0 mmol/l |  
							| HDL (mmol/l) | 1.2 mmol/L |  
							| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 1.6 mmol/l |  
							| Diabetes(%) | 100% |  
							| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.9 |  
							| Stroke history | 5% |  
							| History of hypertension (%) | 52% |  |  Method and design
	
		| Randomized effectives | 959 / 947 (studied vs. control) |  
			| Design | Parallel groups |  
			| Blinding | double blind |  
			| Follow-up duration | 4 year |  
			| Number of centre | 70 |  
			| Geographic area | 14 countries |  
			| Hypothesis | Superiority |  
			| Primary endpoint | cardiovascular events |  
			| Remarks |  |  Remarks / Comments
 Results
	
		
	
	
		
			Endpoint
		
	
	
		
		Studied treat.n/N
			
	
	
		
		Control treat.
 n/N
		
	
	
		
			Graph
		
	
	
		
			RR [95% CI]
 
				Coronary event
				100 / 959 102 / 946
 0,97 [0,75;1,26]
 
				All cause death
				44 / 959 41 / 946
 1,06 [0,70;1,60]
 
				Cardiovascular death
				24 / 959 19 / 946
 classic
					
					
					
				
			
				
				
			
			
		
			
				
					1,25 [0,69;2,26]
 
				cardiovascular events
				100 / 959 102 / 946
 0,97 [0,75;1,26]
 
				stroke (fatal and non fatal) 
				27 / 959 29 / 946
 0,92 [0,55;1,54]
 
				non cardiovascular death 
				20 / 959 22 / 946
 0,90 [0,49;1,63]
				
			
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
			
				0
			
		
		
		
		
		
				2
		
		
		
		
		
			1.0
 
		
		
				
					| Relative risks |  
			| Endpoint | Events (%) | Relative Risk | 95% CI | Endpoint definition in the trial
 | Ref |  
			| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
						| Coronary event | 100 / 959 (10,4%) | 102 / 946 (10,8%) | 0,97 | [0,75;1,26] |  | 11051 |  
						| All cause death | 44 / 959 (4,6%) | 41 / 946 (4,3%) | 1,06 | [0,70;1,60] |  | 11048 |  
						| Cardiovascular death | 24 / 959 (2,5%) | 19 / 946 (2,0%) | 1,25 | [0,69;2,26] |  | 11051 |  
						| cardiovascular events | 100 / 959 (10,4%) | 102 / 946 (10,8%) | 0,97 | [0,75;1,26] |  | 11051 |  
						| stroke (fatal and non fatal) | 27 / 959 (2,8%) | 29 / 946 (3,1%) | 0,92 | [0,55;1,54] |  | 11048 |  
						| non cardiovascular death | 20 / 959 (2,1%) | 22 / 946 (2,3%) | 0,90 | [0,49;1,63] |  | 11051 |  
			| The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters |  
			| Reference(s) used for data extraction: 
				
					11048: Brugts JJ, Yetgin T, Hoeks SE, Gotto AM, Shepherd J, Westendorp RG, de Craen AJ, Knopp RH, Nakamura H, Ridker P, van Domburg R, Deckers JWThe benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ 2009 Jun 30;338:b2376
				
				
					11051: Knopp RH, d'Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJEfficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN).Diabetes Care 2006;29:1478-85
				
				
					0: |  
			
			| Endpoint | studied treat. | control treat. | mean diff |  
	
	
				
					| Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 4 year) |  
		| Endpoint | Events rate | Absolute risk reduction (ARR)
 |  
		| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
				| Coronary event | 10,43% | 10,78% | -0,35% |  
				| All cause death | 4,59% | 4,33% | 0,25% |  
				| Cardiovascular death | 2,50% | 2,01% | 0,49% |  
				| cardiovascular events | 10,43% | 10,78% | -0,35% |  
				| stroke (fatal and non fatal) | 2,82% | 3,07% | -0,25% |  
				| non cardiovascular death | 2,09% | 2,33% | -0,24% |  Meta-analysis of all similar trials: 
				
					cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention
				
			 
		 Reference(s)
	
		| TrialResults-center ID | TRC9788 |  
		| Trials register # | NA |  
			
				
			    Knopp RH, d'Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJ. 
			    Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN)..
			    Diabetes Care 2006;29:1478-85
					- 10.2337/dc05-2415
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext 
 |