Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database Feedback    Home

This trial is included in the following systematic reviews and meta-analyses:

hypertension - strategy - non diabetic patients  

hypertension - strategy - all type of patients  


Related trials

Cardio-Sis, 2009 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

ACCORD blood pressure, 2008 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

REIN-2, 2005 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

AASK, 2002 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

ABCD (N), 2002 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

ABCD (H), 2000 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

Toto, 1995 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

HOT, 1994 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

MDRD, 1994 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie



See also:

  • All hypertension clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of strategy
  • All clinical trials of more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie
  •  

    Cardio-Sis study, 2009

    [NCT00421863]

    Treatments

    Studied treatment tighter control of systolic BP with a goal of <130 mm Hg
    One SBP measure higher than 130 mm Hg at any visit led to intensification of treatment. The choice of drugs in individual patients was left to the discretion of the investigators
    Control treatment usual control, with a goal of <140 mm Hg
    achievement of an SBP <130 mm Hg entailed down-titration of treatment. The choice of drugs in individual patients was left to the discretion of the investigators
    Treatments description
    Achieved systolic blood 131.9 / 135.6 mmHg 
    Achieved diastolic blood pressure 77.4 / 78.7 mmHg 

    Patients

    Patients nondiabetic patients with hypertension and with SBP of 150 mm Hg or higher confirmed at two different times
    Inclusion criteria age >=55 years; SBP >150 mm Hg; antihypertensive treatment for at least 12 weeks; at least one of the following risk factors: smoking, family history of premature CAD, established CAD/PAD, previous TIA/stroke, total cholesterol >201 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <39 mg/dl, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >135 mg/dl
    Exclusion criteria fasting glucose >126 mg/dl; reduced life expectancy; renal dysfunction (creatinine >2 mg/dl); clinically relevant hematologic or hepatic disorders; valvular heart disease; disorders associated with a confusion in the ECG diagnosis of LVH (complete right/left bundle branch block, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, previous Q-wave MI, paced rhythm); AF; substance abuse
    Baseline characteristics
    Age (mean), years 67 y 
    female (%) 59% 
    SBP 163.3 mmHg 
    DBP 89.75 mmHg 

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 558 / 553 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding open
    Follow-up duration 2 years
    Number of centre 44
    Geographic area Italy
    Hypothesis Superiority
    Primary endpoint ECG evidence of LVH


    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)

    4 / 558
    6 / 553
    classic 0,66 [0,19;2,33]

    Heart failure

    3 / 558
    7 / 553
    0,42 [0,11;1,63]

    left ventricular hypertrophy

    55 / 484
    82 / 483
    0,67 [0,49;0,92]

    All cause death

    4 / 558
    5 / 553
    classic 0,79 [0,21;2,94]

    stroke (fatal and non fatal)

    4 / 558
    9 / 553
    0,44 [0,14;1,42]

    Major cardiovascular events

    17 / 558
    32 / 553
    0,53 [0,30;0,94]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) 4 / 558 (0,7%) 6 / 553 (1,1%) 0,66 [0,19;2,33]    
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 4 / 558 (0,7%) 9 / 553 (1,6%) 0,44 [0,14;1,42] strok eor TIA   
    Major cardiovascular events 17 / 558 (3,0%) 32 / 553 (5,8%) 0,53 [0,30;0,94] death, MI, stroke, HF, angina, revascularization   
    left ventricular hypertrophy 55 / 484 (11,4%) 82 / 483 (17,0%) 0,67 [0,49;0,92]    
    All cause death 4 / 558 (0,7%) 5 / 553 (0,9%) 0,79 [0,21;2,94]    
    Heart failure 3 / 558 (0,5%) 7 / 553 (1,3%) 0,42 [0,11;1,63] admission for HF   
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:

    Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) 7,17‰ 1,08% -3,7‰
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 7,17‰ 1,63% -9,1‰
    Major cardiovascular events 3,05% 5,79% -27,4‰
    left ventricular hypertrophy 11,36% 16,98% -56,1‰
    All cause death 7,17‰ 9,04‰ -1,9‰
    Heart failure 5,38‰ 1,27% -7,3‰


    Reference(s)

    Trials register # NCT00421863
    • Verdecchia P, Staessen JA, Angeli F, de Simone G, Achilli A, Ganau A, Mureddu G, Pede S, Maggioni AP, Lucci D, Reboldi G. Usual versus tight control of systolic blood pressure in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomised trial.. Lancet 2009;374:525-33
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2010 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  notify a friend