Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database in Heart and vessels Feedback    Home

Systematic review and meta-analysis

This trial is included in the following systematic reviews and meta-analyses:

cardiovascular prevention - plasma homocysteine lowering intervention - all type of patients


Related trials

CSPPT, 2015 - folic acid vs placebo

VITATOPS, 2010 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo

WAFACS, 2008 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo

WENBIT (vit B6), 2008 - vit B6 vs placebo

WENBIT (folic ac,B12), 2008 - folic acid, B12 vs placebo

SEARCH, 2007 - folic acid, B12 vs placebo

NORVIT (folic acid + B12) (Bonaa), 2006 - folic acid, B12 vs control

NORVIT (folic acid, B12 and vit B6) (Bonaa), 2006 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs control

NORVIT (vit B6) (Bonaa), 2006 - vit B6 vs control

HOPE-2 (Lonn), 2006 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo

FOLARDA (Liem), 2004 - folic acid vs control

VISP (Toole), 2004 - high dose - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs low dose - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6

GOES (Liem), 2003 - folic acid vs control

CHAOS-2, 2002 - folic acid vs placebo

SU.FOL.OM3, - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo



See also:

  • All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of plasma homocysteine lowering intervention
  • All clinical trials of folic acid
  •  
     CSPPT study, 2015 TRC11319 
    [NCT00794885] download pdf: folic acid | plasma homocysteine lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention

    Treatments

    Studied treatment enalapril 10 mg / folic acid 0.8 mg daily
    Control treatment Enalapril maleate 10 mg daily
    Concomittant treatment on top enalapril

    Patients

    Patients patients with primary hypertension

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 10348 / 10354 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding double-blind
    Geographic area China
    Primary endpoint symptomatic stroke ( ischemic or hemorrhagic)


    Results



    Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)

    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    First stroke 282 / 10348 (2,7%) 355 / 10354 (3,4%) 0,79 [0,68;0,93]
    Ischemic stroke 223 / 10348 (2,2%) 292 / 10354 (2,8%) 0,76 [0,64;0,91]
    Hemorrhagic stroke 58 / 10348 (0,6%) 62 / 10354 (0,6%) 0,94 [0,66;1,34]
    Composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death due to cardiovascular causes 324 / 10348 (3,1%) 405 / 10354 (3,9%) 0,80 [0,69;0,92]
    Myocardial infarctione 25 / 10348 (0,2%) 24 / 10354 (0,2%) 1,04 [0,60;1,82]
    Death due to cardiovascular causesf 43 / 10348 (0,4%) 43 / 10354 (0,4%) 1,00 [0,66;1,53]
    All-cause death 302 / 10348 (2,9%) 320 / 10354 (3,1%) 0,94 [0,81;1,10]

    Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    All cause death

    302 / 10348
    320 / 10354
    0,94 [0,81;1,10]

    Non fatal MI

    25 / 10348
    24 / 10354
    1,04 [0,60;1,82]

    cardiovascular events

    324 / 10348
    405 / 10354
    0,80 [0,69;0,92]

    Cardiovascular death

    43 / 10348
    43 / 10354
    1,00 [0,66;1,53]

    stroke (fatal and non fatal)

    282 / 10348
    355 / 10354
    0,79 [0,68;0,93]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    All cause death 302 / 10348 (2,9%) 320 / 10354 (3,1%) 0,94 [0,81;1,10] All-cause death 
    Non fatal MI 25 / 10348 (0,2%) 24 / 10354 (0,2%) 1,04 [0,60;1,82] Myocardial infarctione 
    cardiovascular events 324 / 10348 (3,1%) 405 / 10354 (3,9%) 0,80 [0,69;0,92] Composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death due to cardiovascular causes 
    Cardiovascular death 43 / 10348 (0,4%) 43 / 10354 (0,4%) 1,00 [0,66;1,53] Death due to cardiovascular causesf 
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 282 / 10348 (2,7%) 355 / 10354 (3,4%) 0,79 [0,68;0,93] First stroke  
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:

    Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of )
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    All cause death 2,92% 3,09% -0,17%
    Non fatal MI 2,42‰ 2,32‰ 0,01%
    cardiovascular events 3,13% 3,91% -0,78%
    Cardiovascular death 4,16‰ 4,15‰ 0,00%
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 2,73% 3,43% -0,70%

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    plasma homocysteine lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients



    Reference(s)

    TrialResults-center ID TRC11319
    Trials register # NCT00794885
    • Huo Y, Li J, Qin X, Huang Y, Wang X, Gottesman RF, Tang G, Wang B, Chen D, He M, Fu J, Cai Y, Shi X, Zhang Y, Cui Y, Sun N, Li X, Cheng X, Wang J, Yang X, Yang T, Xiao C, Zhao G, Dong Q, Zhu D, Wang X, Ge J, Zhao L, Hu D, Liu L, Hou FF. Efficacy of Folic Acid Therapy in Primary Prevention of Stroke Among Adults With Hypertension in China: The CSPPT Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA 2015 Mar 15;: - 10.1001/jama.2015.2274
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2015 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  Facebook  |  notify a friend

    100Heart and vessels