Related trials
CSPPT, 2015 - folic acid vs placebo
VITATOPS, 2010 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo
WAFACS, 2008 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo
WENBIT (vit B6), 2008 - vit B6 vs placebo
WENBIT (folic ac,B12), 2008 - folic acid, B12 vs placebo
SEARCH, 2007 - folic acid, B12 vs placebo
NORVIT (folic acid + B12) (Bonaa), 2006 - folic acid, B12 vs control
NORVIT (folic acid, B12 and vit B6) (Bonaa), 2006 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs control
NORVIT (vit B6) (Bonaa), 2006 - vit B6 vs control
HOPE-2 (Lonn), 2006 - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo
FOLARDA (Liem), 2004 - folic acid vs control
VISP (Toole), 2004 - high dose - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs low dose - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6
GOES (Liem), 2003 - folic acid vs control
CHAOS-2, 2002 - folic acid vs placebo
SU.FOL.OM3, - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6 vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All post stroke clinical trials
All clinical trials of prevention
All clinical trials of high dose - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
high-dose of folic acid, pyridoxine (vitamin B6),
and cobalamin (vitamin B12)
25 mg of pyridoxine, 0.4 mg of
cobalamin, and 2.5 mg of folic acid
|
Control treatment |
low-dose of folic acid, pyridoxine (vitamin B6),
and cobalamin (vitamin B12)
200 �g of pyridoxine, 6 �g of cobalamin, and 20 �g of folic acid
|
Patients
Patients |
adults with nondisabling cerebral infarction |
Inclusion criteria |
Nondisabling ischemic stroke(Modified Rankin Stroke Scale <=3), onset <=120 days before; focal neurological deficit of likely atherothrombotic origin, classified as ischemic stroke by questionnaire/algorithm or confirmed as new cerebral infarction, consistent with symptoms by cranial computed tomography or brain magnetic resonance imaging; total homocysteine level >=25th percentile for North American stroke population; age >=35 years |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (yr) |
66 y |
Male sex |
63% |
BMI |
28.1 |
diabetes (%) |
29% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
1827 / 1853 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
2 y |
Lost to follow-up |
0.84% (31/) |
Number of centre |
56 |
Geographic area |
United States, Canada, Scotland |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
Recurrent cerebral infarction |
Results
Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
|
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Any Ischemic stroke |
152 / 1827 (8,3%) |
148 / 1853 (8,0%) |
1,04 |
[0,84;1,29] |
|
Fatal or disabling Ischemic stroke |
21 / 1827 (1,1%) |
18 / 1853 (1,0%) |
1,18 |
[0,63;2,21] |
|
Any CHD |
114 / 1827 (6,2%) |
123 / 1853 (6,6%) |
0,94 |
[0,73;1,20] |
|
MI or fatal CHD |
72 / 1827 (3,9%) |
81 / 1853 (4,4%) |
0,90 |
[0,66;1,23] |
|
Any Ischemic stroke or CHD |
249 / 1827 (13,6%) |
257 / 1853 (13,9%) |
0,98 |
[0,84;1,16] |
|
Fatal or disabling stroke or MI or fatal CHD |
89 / 1827 (4,9%) |
98 / 1853 (5,3%) |
0,92 |
[0,70;1,22] |
|
Death |
99 / 1827 (5,4%) |
117 / 1853 (6,3%) |
0,86 |
[0,66;1,11] |
|
Ischemic stroke, CHD, death |
303 / 1827 (16,6%) |
316 / 1853 (17,1%) |
0,97 |
[0,84;1,12] |
|
Fatal or disabling stroke, MI, death |
156 / 1827 (8,5%) |
170 / 1853 (9,2%) |
0,93 |
[0,76;1,15] |
|
Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
All cause death
99 / 1827
117 / 1853
0,86 [0,66;1,11]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
152 / 1827
148 / 1853
1,04 [0,84;1,29]
Non fatal MI
72 / 1827
81 / 1853
0,90 [0,66;1,23]
cardiovascular events
303 / 1827
316 / 1853
0,97 [0,84;1,12]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
All cause death
|
99 / 1827 (5,4%) |
117 / 1853 (6,3%) |
0,86 |
[0,66;1,11] |
Death |
0 |
Non fatal MI
|
72 / 1827 (3,9%) |
81 / 1853 (4,4%) |
0,90 |
[0,66;1,23] |
MI or fatal CHD |
0 |
cardiovascular events
|
303 / 1827 (16,6%) |
316 / 1853 (17,1%) |
0,97 |
[0,84;1,12] |
Ischemic stroke, CHD, death |
0 |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
152 / 1827 (8,3%) |
148 / 1853 (8,0%) |
1,04 |
[0,84;1,29] |
Any Ischemic stroke |
0 |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 2 y)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
All cause death |
5,42% |
6,31% |
-0,90%
|
Non fatal MI |
3,94% |
4,37% |
-0,43%
|
cardiovascular events |
16,58% |
17,05% |
-0,47%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
8,32% |
7,99% |
0,33%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
plasma homocysteine lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
prevention in post stroke for patients with prior stroke or TIA
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC8857
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Spence JD, Bang H, Chambless LE, Stampfer MJ.
Vitamin Intervention For Stroke Prevention trial: an efficacy analysis..
Stroke 2005 Nov;36:2404-9
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Toole JF, Malinow MR, Chambless LE, Spence JD, Pettigrew LC, Howard VJ, Sides EG, Wang CH, Stampfer M.
Lowering homocysteine in patients with ischemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death: the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) randomized controlled trial..
JAMA 2004 Feb 4;291:565-75
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|