Related trials
ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
ILLUSTRATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of HDL increasing drugs
All clinical trials of fenofibrate
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
fenofibrate 200mg/d
|
Control treatment |
Placebo
|
Treatments description |
total cholesterol change |
-11.6% at 1 year |
LDL change |
-11.9% at 1 year |
HDL change |
+4.5% |
|
Patients
Patients |
participants aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and not taking statin therapy at study entry |
Inclusion criteria |
total-cholesterol concentration of 3�0�6�5 mmol/L and a total-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio of 4�0 or more or plasma triglyceride of 1�0�5�0 mmol/L |
Exclusion criteria |
renal impairment, chronic liver disease, symptomatic gallbladder disease, cardiovascular event within the 3 months before recruitment |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
62.2 y |
Women (%) |
37% |
prior MI or CHD (%) |
22% |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) |
5.03 mmol/L |
LDL (mmol/l) |
3.07 mmol/L |
HDL (mmol/l) |
1.10 mmol/L |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
1.73 mmol/L |
Diabetes(%) |
100% |
BMI (kg/m2) |
29.8 |
Stroke history |
3.5% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
4895 / 4900 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
5 years |
Lost to follow-up |
0.22% (22/9795) |
Number of centre |
63 |
Geographic area |
Australia, New Zealand, Finland |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
coronary events |
Results
Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
|
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary events |
256 / 4895 (5,2%) |
288 / 4900 (5,9%) |
0,89 |
[0,76;1,05] |
|
Coronary heart disease mortality |
110 / 4895 (2,2%) |
93 / 4900 (1,9%) |
1,18 |
[0,90;1,56] |
|
Non-fatal myocardial infarction |
158 / 4895 (3,2%) |
207 / 4900 (4,2%) |
0,76 |
[0,62;0,94] |
|
Total cardiovascular disease events |
612 / 4895 (12,5%) |
683 / 4900 (13,9%) |
0,90 |
[0,81;0,99] |
|
Cardiovascular disease mortality |
140 / 4895 (2,9%) |
127 / 4900 (2,6%) |
1,10 |
[0,87;1,40] |
|
Total mortality |
356 / 4895 (7,3%) |
323 / 4900 (6,6%) |
1,10 |
[0,95;1,28] |
|
Total stroke |
158 / 4895 (3,2%) |
175 / 4900 (3,6%) |
0,90 |
[0,73;1,12] |
|
Non-haemorrhagic stroke |
144 / 4895 (2,9%) |
158 / 4900 (3,2%) |
0,91 |
[0,73;1,14] |
|
Coronary revascularisation |
290 / 4895 (5,9%) |
364 / 4900 (7,4%) |
0,80 |
[0,69;0,93] |
|
All revascularisation� |
380 / 4895 (7,8%) |
471 / 4900 (9,6%) |
0,81 |
[0,71;0,92] |
|
Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
256 / 4895
288 / 4900
0,89 [0,76;1,05]
All cause death
356 / 4895
323 / 4900
1,10 [0,95;1,28]
Cardiovascular death
140 / 4895
127 / 4900
1,10 [0,87;1,40]
cardiovascular events
612 / 4895
683 / 4900
0,90 [0,81;0,99]
Venous thromboembolism
120 / 4895
80 / 4900
1,50 [1,13;1,99]
Coronary death
110 / 4895
93 / 4900
1,18 [0,90;1,56]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
158 / 4895
175 / 4900
0,90 [0,73;1,12]
Non fatal MI
158 / 4895
207 / 4900
0,76 [0,62;0,94]
Rhabdomyolysis
3 / 4895
1 / 4900
classic
3,00 [0,31;28,86]
Death from cancer
168 / 4895
148 / 4900
1,14 [0,91;1,41]
Myopathy
2 / 4895
1 / 4900
classic
2,00 [0,18;22,07]
Coronary death and non fatal MI
256 / 4895
288 / 4900
0,89 [0,76;1,05]
Adverse events
38 / 4895
24 / 4900
classic
1,58 [0,95;2,64]
cardiac death
110 / 4895
93 / 4900
1,18 [0,90;1,56]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event
|
256 / 4895 (5,2%) |
288 / 4900 (5,9%) |
0,89 |
[0,76;1,05] |
|
12545 |
All cause death
|
356 / 4895 (7,3%) |
323 / 4900 (6,6%) |
1,10 |
[0,95;1,28] |
|
|
Cardiovascular death
|
140 / 4895 (2,9%) |
127 / 4900 (2,6%) |
1,10 |
[0,87;1,40] |
|
|
cardiovascular events
|
612 / 4895 (12,5%) |
683 / 4900 (13,9%) |
0,90 |
[0,81;0,99] |
|
0 |
Venous thromboembolism
|
120 / 4895 (2,5%) |
80 / 4900 (1,6%) |
1,50 |
[1,13;1,99] |
|
12562 |
Coronary death
|
110 / 4895 (2,2%) |
93 / 4900 (1,9%) |
1,18 |
[0,90;1,56] |
|
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
158 / 4895 (3,2%) |
175 / 4900 (3,6%) |
0,90 |
[0,73;1,12] |
|
|
Non fatal MI
|
158 / 4895 (3,2%) |
207 / 4900 (4,2%) |
0,76 |
[0,62;0,94] |
|
|
Rhabdomyolysis
|
3 / 4895 (0,1%) |
1 / 4900 (0,0%) |
3,00 |
[0,31;28,86] |
|
|
Death from cancer
|
168 / 4895 (3,4%) |
148 / 4900 (3,0%) |
1,14 |
[0,91;1,41] |
|
|
Myopathy
|
2 / 4895 (0,0%) |
1 / 4900 (0,0%) |
2,00 |
[0,18;22,07] |
|
0 |
Coronary death and non fatal MI
|
256 / 4895 (5,2%) |
288 / 4900 (5,9%) |
0,89 |
[0,76;1,05] |
|
|
Adverse events
|
38 / 4895 (0,8%) |
24 / 4900 (0,5%) |
1,58 |
[0,95;2,64] |
|
|
cardiac death
|
110 / 4895 (2,2%) |
93 / 4900 (1,9%) |
1,18 |
[0,90;1,56] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
12545: Jun M, Foote C, Lv J, Neal B, Patel A, Nicholls SJ, Grobbee DE, Cass A, Chalmers J, Perkovic VEffects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet 2010 May 10;:
0:
12562: Squizzato A, Galli M, Romualdi E, Dentali F, Kamphuisen PW, Guasti L, Venco A, Ageno WStatins, fibrates, and venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.Eur Heart J 2010 May;31:1248-56
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
total cholesterol (at 1 y) |
4,23 (0,78) |
4,56 (0,9) |
-0,33 |
[-0,363;-0,30] |
HDL (at 1 y) |
1,13 (0,3) |
1,12 (0,29) |
0,01 |
[-0,002;0,02] |
LDL |
2,43 (0,65) |
2,6 (0,78) |
-0,17 |
[-0,198;-0,14] |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 5 years)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event |
5,23% |
5,88% |
-0,65%
|
All cause death |
7,27% |
6,59% |
0,68%
|
Cardiovascular death |
2,86% |
2,59% |
0,27%
|
cardiovascular events |
12,50% |
13,94% |
-1,44%
|
Venous thromboembolism |
2,45% |
1,63% |
0,82%
|
Coronary death |
2,25% |
1,90% |
0,35%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
3,23% |
3,57% |
-0,34%
|
Non fatal MI |
3,23% |
4,22% |
-1,00%
|
Rhabdomyolysis |
0,61‰ |
0,20‰ |
0,04%
|
Death from cancer |
3,43% |
3,02% |
0,41%
|
Myopathy |
0,41‰ |
0,20‰ |
0,02%
|
Coronary death and non fatal MI |
5,23% |
5,88% |
-0,65%
|
Adverse events |
7,76‰ |
4,90‰ |
0,29%
|
cardiac death |
2,25% |
1,90% |
0,35%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
-
.
The need for a large-scale trial of fibrate therapy in diabetes: the rationale and design of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. [ISRCTN64783481]..
Cardiovasc Diabetol 2004 Dec 1;3:9
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Scott R, Best J, Forder P, Taskinen MR, Simes J, Barter P, Keech A.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study: baseline characteristics and short-term effects of fenofibrate [ISRCTN64783481]..
Cardiovasc Diabetol 2005 Aug 22;4:13
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
.
.
Lancet 2005
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, Best J, Scott R, Taskinen MR, Forder P, Pillai A, Davis T, Glasziou P, Drury P, Kesaniemi YA, Sullivan D, Hunt D, Colman P, d'Emden M, Whiting M, Ehnholm C, Laakso M.
Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial..
Lancet 2005 Nov 26;366:1849-61
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Hiukka A, Westerbacka J, Leinonen ES, Watanabe H, Wiklund O, Hulten LM, Salonen JT, Tuomainen TP, Yki-J�rvinen H, Keech AC, Taskinen MR.
Long-term effects of fenofibrate on carotid intima-media thickness and augmentation index in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus..
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 Dec 16;52:2190-7
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.049
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Hiukka A, Westerbacka J, Leinonen ES, Watanabe H, Wiklund O, Hulten LM, Salonen JT, Tuomainen TP, Yki-J�rvinen H, Keech AC, Taskinen MR.
Long-term effects of fenofibrate on carotid intima-media thickness and augmentation index in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus..
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 Dec 16;52:2190-7
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Rajamani K, Colman PG, Li LP, Best JD, Voysey M, D'Emden MC, Laakso M, Baker JR, Keech AC.
Effect of fenofibrate on amputation events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (FIELD study): a prespecified analysis of a randomised controlled trial..
Lancet 2009 May 23;373:1780-8
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60698-X
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|