Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database in Heart and vessels Feedback    Home


Related trials

ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 High dose, 2013 - edoxaban vs warfarin standard dose

AVERROES, 2011 - apixaban vs aspirin

ARISTOTLE, 2011 - apixaban vs warfarin standard dose

ROCKET-AF, 2010 - rivaroxaban vs warfarin standard dose

Lip (phase 2 AZD0837), 2009 - AZD0837 vs warfarin standard dose

ACTIVE A, 2009 - aspirin + clopidogrel vs aspirin

RE-LY (150mg), 2009 - dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose

RE-LY (110mg), 2009 - dabigatran 110mg vs warfarin standard dose

AMADEUS, 2008 - idraparinux vs warfarin standard dose

PETRO (150mg), 2007 - dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose

Japanese AF Trial, 2006 - aspirin vs control

ACTIVE W, 2006 - aspirin + clopidogrel vs anticoagulant

SPORTIF V, 2005 - ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose

NASPEAF (triflusal vs coumadin standard dose)), 2004 - triflusal vs coumadin standard dose

NASPEAF (triflusal + coumadin medium dose vs coumadin standard dose), 2004 - triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs coumadin standard dose

NASPEAF (triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs triflusal), 2004 - triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs triflusal

SAFT(warfarin low dose + aspirin vs no treatment), 2003 - warfarin low dose + aspirin vs control

SPORTIF III, 2003 - ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose

SPORTIF II (ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose), 2002 - ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose

PATAF (coumadin low dose vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 - coumadin low dose vs coumadin standard dose

PATAF (vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 - aspirin vs coumadin standard dose

LASAF(aspirin vs no treatment), 1999 - aspirin vs control

PATAF (vs coumadin low dose), 1999 - aspirin vs coumadin low dose

AFASAK II (aspirin vs warfarin low dose), 1998 - aspirin vs warfarin low dose

AFASAK II (warfarin low dose+aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 - warfarin + aspirin vs warfarin standard dose



See also:

  • All atrial fibrillation clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of new oral anticoagulants
  • All clinical trials of ximelagatran
  •  
     SPORTIF II (ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose) study, 2002 TRC2636 
    download pdf: ximelagatran | antithrombotics for atrial fibrillation

    Treatments

    Studied treatment ximelegatran 20,40,60 mg twice daily
    Control treatment warfarin standard dose(target INR 2-3)
    Concomittant treatment Beta-blockers,angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,calcium antagonists Low doses of aspirin are accepted(up to 160 mg/day)
    Remarks -treatment with either NSAI agents or fibrinolytic agents within the week before the start was prohibited -patient previously receiving warfarin were given ximelegatran once INR value was 1.5 or under/after the end of the study patients who stopped ximelegatran began warfarin 12 to 24 h after last intake.

    Patients

    Patients Medium to high risk patients with chronic non valvular atrial fibrillation.
    Inclusion criteria -one or more stroke risk factor in addition to AF:history of hypertension,age >65,previous stroke or TIA,previous systemic embolism,left ventricular dysfunction,diabete mellitus,coronary heart disease -age>18 -paroxysmal or persistent NVAF verified by at least 2 ECG
    Exclusion criteria Stroke and /or systemic embolism within the previous 2 years,Condition associated with increased risk of bleeding,NVAF secondary to other reversible disorders,presence of mecanical heart valves,Myocardial infarction,coronary artery bypass grafting or Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty within previous 3 month,Diagnosis of left ventricular aneurysm or atrial myxoma,Treatment with NSAIDs or fibrinolytics within previous week,Renal impairment,Blood pressure >180/100,History of rheumatic fever,Liver insufficiency,Hb<100g/l,Plat<100000,Contra-indication to warfarin treatment
    Remarks -SPORTIF II is a dose guiding study -66 patient received 20mg,62 received 40mg,59 received 60 mg
    Baseline characteristics
    age(mean) 70 
    male(%) 61 
    hypertension(%) 57 
    diabete mellitus(%) 21 
    left ventricular dysfunction(%) 31 
    subgroup test

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 187 / 67 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding Open
    Follow-up duration 16 weeks
    Number of centre 37
    Geographic area Europe ,USA
    Primary endpoint Thrombo-embolic events and bleedings
    Remarks it is a dose guiding study


    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    systemic thrombo-embolic complication

    0 / 187
    0 / 67
    classic 0,36 [0,00;90,95]

    stroke (fatal and non fatal)

    1 / 187
    0 / 67
    classic 1,79 [0,02;130,07]

    ischemic stroke

    1 / 187
    0 / 67
    classic 1,79 [0,02;130,07]

    All cause death

    1 / 187
    0 / 67
    classic 1,79 [0,02;130,07]

    Major bleeding

    0 / 187
    1 / 67
    classic 0,07 [0,00;5,20]

    Minor bleeding

    16 / 187
    6 / 67
    classic 0,96 [0,39;2,34]

    Haemmorhagic stroke

    0 / 187
    0 / 67
    classic 0,36 [0,00;90,95]

    Fatal stroke

    0 / 187
    0 / 67
    classic 0,36 [0,00;90,95]

    Adverse events

    90 / 187
    34 / 67
    0,95 [0,72;1,25]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0 / 187 (0,3%) 0 / 67 (0,7%) 0,36 [0,01;17,88]  
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 1 / 187 (0,5%) 0 / 67 (0,7%) 0,72 [0,02;21,12] assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resona 
    ischemic stroke 1 / 187 (0,5%) 0 / 67 (0,7%) 0,72 [0,02;21,12]  
    All cause death 1 / 187 (0,5%) 0 / 67 (0,7%) 0,72 [0,02;21,12]  
    Major bleeding 0 / 187 (0,3%) 1 / 67 (1,5%) 0,18 [0,01;5,28] clinically overt bleeding and critical site bleeding(intracranial,retroperitoneal,intraocular,spinal,pericardial) and/or number of units transfused <2 or drop of Hb>2.0g/l and/or need for a medical or surgical intervention 
    Minor bleeding 16 / 187 (8,6%) 6 / 67 (9,0%) 0,96 [0,39;2,34] clinically overt bleeding , no critical site bleeding, no drop of Hb >2g/l, no need for medical or surgical intervention 
    Haemmorhagic stroke 0 / 187 (0,3%) 0 / 67 (0,7%) 0,36 [0,01;17,88]  
    Fatal stroke 0 / 187 (0,3%) 0 / 67 (0,7%) 0,36 [0,01;17,88]  
    Adverse events 90 / 187 (48,1%) 34 / 67 (50,7%) 0,95 [0,72;1,25]  
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:
  • 0:

  • Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 16 weeks)
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    Minor bleeding 8,56% 8,96% -0,40%
    Adverse events 48,13% 50,75% -2,62%

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    antithrombotics in atrial fibrillation for primary prevention of thromboembolic events

    direct antithrombins in atrial fibrillation for all type of patients

    new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation for all type of patients



    Reference(s)

    TrialResults-center ID TRC2636
    Trials register # NA
    • Petersen P, Grind M, Adler J. Ximelagatran versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. SPORTIF II: a dose-guiding, tolerability, and safety study.. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 May 7;41:1445-51
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2015 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  Facebook  |  notify a friend

    100Heart and vessels