Related trials
ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 High dose, 2013 - edoxaban vs warfarin standard dose
AVERROES, 2011 - apixaban vs aspirin
ARISTOTLE, 2011 - apixaban vs warfarin standard dose
ROCKET-AF, 2010 - rivaroxaban vs warfarin standard dose
Lip (phase 2 AZD0837), 2009 - AZD0837 vs warfarin standard dose
ACTIVE A, 2009 - aspirin + clopidogrel vs aspirin
RE-LY (150mg), 2009 - dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose
RE-LY (110mg), 2009 - dabigatran 110mg vs warfarin standard dose
AMADEUS, 2008 - idraparinux vs warfarin standard dose
PETRO (150mg), 2007 - dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose
Japanese AF Trial, 2006 - aspirin vs control
ACTIVE W, 2006 - aspirin + clopidogrel vs anticoagulant
SPORTIF V, 2005 - ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose
NASPEAF (triflusal vs coumadin standard dose)), 2004 - triflusal vs coumadin standard dose
NASPEAF (triflusal + coumadin medium dose vs coumadin standard dose), 2004 - triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs coumadin standard dose
NASPEAF (triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs triflusal), 2004 - triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs triflusal
SAFT(warfarin low dose + aspirin vs no treatment), 2003 - warfarin low dose + aspirin vs control
SPORTIF III, 2003 - ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose
SPORTIF II (ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose), 2002 - ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose
PATAF (coumadin low dose vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 - coumadin low dose vs coumadin standard dose
PATAF (vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 - aspirin vs coumadin standard dose
LASAF(aspirin vs no treatment), 1999 - aspirin vs control
PATAF (vs coumadin low dose), 1999 - aspirin vs coumadin low dose
AFASAK II (aspirin vs warfarin low dose), 1998 - aspirin vs warfarin low dose
AFASAK II (warfarin low dose+aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 - warfarin + aspirin vs warfarin standard dose
See also:
All atrial fibrillation clinical trials
All clinical trials of new oral anticoagulants
All clinical trials of ximelagatran
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
ximelegatran 20,40,60 mg twice daily
|
Control treatment |
warfarin standard dose(target INR 2-3)
|
Concomittant treatment |
Beta-blockers,angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,calcium antagonists
Low doses of aspirin are accepted(up to 160 mg/day) |
Remarks |
-treatment with either NSAI agents or fibrinolytic agents within the week before the start was prohibited
-patient previously receiving warfarin were given ximelegatran once INR value was 1.5 or under/after the end of the study patients who stopped ximelegatran began warfarin 12 to 24 h after last intake. |
Patients
Patients |
Medium to high risk patients with chronic non valvular atrial fibrillation. |
Inclusion criteria |
-one or more stroke risk factor in addition to AF:history of hypertension,age >65,previous stroke or TIA,previous systemic embolism,left ventricular dysfunction,diabete mellitus,coronary heart disease
-age>18
-paroxysmal or persistent NVAF verified by at least 2 ECG |
Exclusion criteria |
Stroke and /or systemic embolism within the previous 2 years,Condition associated with increased risk of bleeding,NVAF secondary to other reversible disorders,presence of mecanical heart valves,Myocardial infarction,coronary artery bypass grafting or Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty within previous 3 month,Diagnosis of left ventricular aneurysm or atrial myxoma,Treatment with NSAIDs or fibrinolytics within previous week,Renal impairment,Blood pressure >180/100,History of rheumatic fever,Liver insufficiency,Hb<100g/l,Plat<100000,Contra-indication to warfarin treatment |
Remarks |
-SPORTIF II is a dose guiding study
-66 patient received 20mg,62 received 40mg,59 received 60 mg |
Baseline characteristics |
age(mean) |
70 |
male(%) |
61 |
hypertension(%) |
57 |
diabete mellitus(%) |
21 |
left ventricular dysfunction(%) |
31 |
subgroup test |
d |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
187 / 67 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
Open |
Follow-up duration |
16 weeks |
Number of centre |
37 |
Geographic area |
Europe ,USA |
Primary endpoint |
Thrombo-embolic events and bleedings |
Remarks |
it is a dose guiding study |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
systemic thrombo-embolic complication
0 / 187
0 / 67
classic
0,36 [0,00;90,95]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
1 / 187
0 / 67
classic
1,79 [0,02;130,07]
ischemic stroke
1 / 187
0 / 67
classic
1,79 [0,02;130,07]
All cause death
1 / 187
0 / 67
classic
1,79 [0,02;130,07]
Major bleeding
0 / 187
1 / 67
classic
0,07 [0,00;5,20]
Minor bleeding
16 / 187
6 / 67
classic
0,96 [0,39;2,34]
Haemmorhagic stroke
0 / 187
0 / 67
classic
0,36 [0,00;90,95]
Fatal stroke
0 / 187
0 / 67
classic
0,36 [0,00;90,95]
Adverse events
90 / 187
34 / 67
0,95 [0,72;1,25]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
systemic thrombo-embolic complication
|
0 / 187 (0,3%) |
0 / 67 (0,7%) |
0,36 |
[0,01;17,88] |
|
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
1 / 187 (0,5%) |
0 / 67 (0,7%) |
0,72 |
[0,02;21,12] |
assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resona |
|
ischemic stroke
|
1 / 187 (0,5%) |
0 / 67 (0,7%) |
0,72 |
[0,02;21,12] |
|
|
All cause death
|
1 / 187 (0,5%) |
0 / 67 (0,7%) |
0,72 |
[0,02;21,12] |
|
|
Major bleeding
|
0 / 187 (0,3%) |
1 / 67 (1,5%) |
0,18 |
[0,01;5,28] |
clinically overt bleeding and critical site bleeding(intracranial,retroperitoneal,intraocular,spinal,pericardial) and/or number of units transfused <2 or drop of Hb>2.0g/l and/or need for a medical or surgical intervention |
|
Minor bleeding
|
16 / 187 (8,6%) |
6 / 67 (9,0%) |
0,96 |
[0,39;2,34] |
clinically overt bleeding , no critical site bleeding, no drop of Hb >2g/l, no need for medical or surgical intervention |
|
Haemmorhagic stroke
|
0 / 187 (0,3%) |
0 / 67 (0,7%) |
0,36 |
[0,01;17,88] |
|
|
Fatal stroke
|
0 / 187 (0,3%) |
0 / 67 (0,7%) |
0,36 |
[0,01;17,88] |
|
|
Adverse events
|
90 / 187 (48,1%) |
34 / 67 (50,7%) |
0,95 |
[0,72;1,25] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 16 weeks)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Minor bleeding |
8,56% |
8,96% |
-0,40%
|
Adverse events |
48,13% |
50,75% |
-2,62%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
antithrombotics in atrial fibrillation for primary prevention of thromboembolic events
direct antithrombins in atrial fibrillation for all type of patients
new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation for all type of patients
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC2636
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Petersen P, Grind M, Adler J.
Ximelagatran versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. SPORTIF II: a dose-guiding, tolerability, and safety study..
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 May 7;41:1445-51
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|