Related trials
ACCOMPLISH (diabetic subgroup), 2010 - benazepril + amlodipine vs benazepril + hydrochlorothiazide
ACCORD blood pressure, 2010 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie
AVOID, 2008 - aliskiren vs placebo
ABCD (N), 2002 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie
ALLHAT (lisi vs chlor, diabetic subgroup), 2002 - lisinopril vs chlorthalidone
LIFE (diabetic subgroup), 2002 - losartan vs atenolol
ALLHAT (amlodipine vs chlor, diabetic subgroup), 2002 - amlodipine vs chlorthalidone
IPDM, 2001 - irbesartan vs placebo
IDNT amlodipine, 2001 - amlodipine vs placebo
RENAAL, 2001 - losartan vs placebo
IDNT irbesartan, 2001 - Irbesartan vs placebo
IDNT (irbesartan vs amlodipine), 2001 - Irbesartan vs amlodipine
STOP-2 CCB (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - calcium-channel blocker vs diuretic or beta-blocker
INSIGHT (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - Nifedipine vs coamilozide
ABCD (H), 2000 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie
NORDIL (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - Diltiazem vs diuretic or beta-blocker
STOP-2 (ACEI vs CCB) (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - ACE inhibitor vs CCB
HOPE (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - ACE inhibitor vs placebo
STOP-2 ACEI (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - ACE inhibitor vs diuretic or beta-blocker
CAPP (diabetic subgroup), 1999 - captopril vs diuretic or beta-blocker
Syst-Eur (diabetic subgroup), 1999 - nitrendipine vs placebo
ABCD, 1998 - nisoldipine vs enalapril
UKPDS 38, 1998 - captopril or atenolol vs control
UKPDS 39, 1998 - captopril vs atenolol
FACET, 1997 - amlodipine vs fosinopril
See also:
All diabetes clinical trials
All hypertension clinical trials
All clinical trials of anti hypertensive agent
All clinical trials of Nifedipine
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
Nifedipine GITS 30 mg daily
|
Control treatment |
co-amilozide hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg plus amiloride 2.5 mg
|
Patients
Patients |
diabetic (subgroup) patients aged 55-80 years with hypertension (blood pressure >= 150/95 mm Hg, or >= 160 mmHg systolic) |
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
649 / 653 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double-blind |
Geographic area |
Europe, Israel |
Primary endpoint |
CV events |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
cardiovascular event (fatal and non fatal)
NA / -9
NA / -9
0,99 [0,69;1,42]
All cause death
NA / -9
NA / -9
0,75 [0,52;1,09]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
anti hypertensive agent in diabetes for type1 and 2 diabetic patients with hypertension
anti hypertensive agent in hypertension for diabetic patients
Reference(s)
-
Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, de Leeuw PW, Mancia G, Rosenthal T, Ruilope LM.
Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)..
Lancet 2000;356:366-72
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02527-7
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|