List Of Non Gamstop Casinos UKCasinos Not On GamstopNon Gamstop CasinosCasino Non Aams ItaliaNon Gamstop Casinos
Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database Feedback    Home

Systematic review and meta-analysis

This trial is included in the following systematic reviews and meta-analyses:

diabetes - anti hypertensive agent - type1 and 2 diabetic patients with hypertension

hypertension - anti hypertensive agent - diabetic patients


Related trials

ACCOMPLISH (diabetic subgroup), 2010 - benazepril + amlodipine vs benazepril + hydrochlorothiazide

ACCORD blood pressure, 2010 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

AVOID, 2008 - aliskiren vs placebo

ABCD (N), 2002 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

ALLHAT (lisi vs chlor, diabetic subgroup), 2002 - lisinopril vs chlorthalidone

LIFE (diabetic subgroup), 2002 - losartan vs atenolol

ALLHAT (amlodipine vs chlor, diabetic subgroup), 2002 - amlodipine vs chlorthalidone

IPDM, 2001 - irbesartan vs placebo

IDNT amlodipine, 2001 - amlodipine vs placebo

RENAAL, 2001 - losartan vs placebo

IDNT irbesartan, 2001 - Irbesartan vs placebo

IDNT (irbesartan vs amlodipine), 2001 - Irbesartan vs amlodipine

STOP-2 CCB (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - calcium-channel blocker vs diuretic or beta-blocker

INSIGHT (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - Nifedipine vs coamilozide

ABCD (H), 2000 - more intensive blood pressure lowering strategie vs less intensive blood pressure lowering strategie

NORDIL (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - Diltiazem vs diuretic or beta-blocker

STOP-2 (ACEI vs CCB) (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - ACE inhibitor vs CCB

HOPE (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - ACE inhibitor vs placebo

STOP-2 ACEI (diabetic subgroup), 2000 - ACE inhibitor vs diuretic or beta-blocker

CAPP (diabetic subgroup), 1999 - captopril vs diuretic or beta-blocker

Syst-Eur (diabetic subgroup), 1999 - nitrendipine vs placebo

ABCD, 1998 - nisoldipine vs enalapril

UKPDS 38, 1998 - captopril or atenolol vs control

UKPDS 39, 1998 - captopril vs atenolol

FACET, 1997 - amlodipine vs fosinopril



See also:

  • All diabetes clinical trials
  • All hypertension clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of anti hypertensive agent
  • All clinical trials of amlodipine
    		•  

    IDNT amlodipine study, 2001

    Facebook    pdf : amlodipine - anti hypertensive agent for hypertension

    Treatments

    Studied treatment Amlodipine 10 mg daily
    Control treatment placebo

    Patients

    Patients hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes
    Inclusion criteria age between 30 and 70 years; documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension (systolic blood pressure of more than 135 mm Hg while sitting, diastolic blood pressure of more than 85 mm Hg while sitting, or documented treatment with antihypertensive agents); proteinuria, with urinary protein excretion of at least 900 mg per 24 hours. Serum creatinine concentration between 1.0 and 3.0 mg per deciliter (88 and 265 ìmol per liter) in women and 1.2 and 3.0 mg per deciliter (106 and 265 ìmol per liter) in men
    Baseline characteristics
    Glycosylated hemoglobin 8.2% 
    BP (systolic/diastolic) 158/87 
    Female (%) 31% 
    Age 59 y 
    subgroup no 
    hypertension (%) 100% 

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 567 / 569 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding double-blind
    Follow-up duration 2.6 years
    Number of centre 210
    Geographic area Worldwide
    Hypothesis Superiority
    Primary endpoint renal death


    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N     Control treat.
    n/N     Graph RR [95% CI]

    renal death

    233 / 567
         222 / 569
         1,05 [0,91;1,21]

    cardiovascular event (fatal and non fatal)

    NA / 567
         NA / 569
         0,88 [0,69;1,12]

    All cause death

    83 / 567
         93 / 569
         0,90 [0,68;1,18]

    microvascular events

    NA / 567
         NA / 569
         1,04 [0,86;1,25]     0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial    		 Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    renal death 233 / 567 (41,1%) 222 / 569 (39,0%) 1,05 [0,91;1,21]   12498 
    All cause death 83 / 567 (14,6%) 93 / 569 (16,3%) 0,90 [0,68;1,18]   12498 
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:
  • 12498: Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, Ritz E, Atkins RC, Rohde R, Raz IRenoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.N Engl J Med 2001;345:851-60

    • Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    renal death 41,09% 39,02% 2,1%
    All cause death 14,64% 16,34% -17,1‰

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    anti hypertensive agent in diabetes for type1 and 2 diabetic patients with hypertension

    anti hypertensive agent in hypertension for diabetic patients



    Reference(s)

    Trials register # NA
    • Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, Ritz E, Atkins RC, Rohde R, Raz I. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.. N Engl J Med 2001;345:851-60
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2010 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  notify a friend

    Digital discoveries