Related trials
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Yamada, 2007 - atorvastatin vs control
MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control
Sola, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Wojnicz, 2006 - atorvastatin vs control
ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Hong, 2005 - simvastatin vs control
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All heart failure clinical trials
All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
All clinical trials of rosuvastatin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
low-dose rosuvastatin 10 mg daily
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Concomittant treatment |
factorial design |
Patients
Patients |
Patients with NYHA classes II to IV heart failure, whatever the cause and the LVEF
and already receiving optimized recommended therapy with no clear indication or contraindication to cholesterollowering therapy |
Inclusion criteria |
men and women; aged 18 years or older; symptomatic heart failure NYHA II�IV, treated according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines (for patients with LVEF >40%, at least one hospital admission for congestive heart failure in the preceding year) |
Exclusion criteria |
any noncardiac comorbidity incompatible with a sufficiently long follow-up; acute coronary syndrome or a revascularisation procedure within 1 month before; planned cardiac surgery, expected to be done within 3 months after randomisation; significant liver disease; serum creatinine concentration greater than 221 �mol/L; alanine and aspartate transaminase > 1�5x UNL; creatine phosphokinase >UNL; hypersensitivity to study treatment; |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (year) |
68 |
Women (%) |
22 |
NYHA II |
62 |
NYHA III |
34.5 |
NYHA IV |
2 |
LVEF (%) |
33 |
Previous MI |
32 |
Diabetes (%) |
26 |
Previous stroke |
4 |
Ischaemic cause (%) |
39.5 |
Dilatative cause (%) |
34 |
Hypertensive cause |
17.5 |
ACE inhibitors |
77 |
ARBs |
18 |
� blockers |
62 |
Spironolactone |
40 |
Diuretic drugs |
90 |
Digitalis |
40 |
Oral anticoagulant drugs |
29.5 |
Nitrates |
32 |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
2314 / 2317 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
3.9y median (IQR 3-4.4) |
Lost to follow-up |
n=4 |
Number of centre |
326 |
Geographic area |
Italy |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
death and death+hospitalization |
Results
Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
|
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Patients who died of cardiovascular reasons |
478 / 2314 (20,7%) |
488 / 2317 (21,1%) |
0,98 |
[0,88;1,10] |
|
Patients who had an SCD |
220 / 2314 (9,5%) |
196 / 2317 (8,5%) |
1,12 |
[0,94;1,35] |
|
Patients admitted |
1278 / 2314 (55,2%) |
1286 / 2317 (55,5%) |
1,00 |
[0,94;1,05] |
|
Patients admitted for a cardiovascular reason |
1033 / 2314 (44,6%) |
1060 / 2317 (45,7%) |
0,98 |
[0,92;1,04] |
|
Patients admitted for heart failure |
629 / 2314 (27,2%) |
634 / 2317 (27,4%) |
0,99 |
[0,90;1,09] |
|
Patients who died of a cardiovascular cause or were admitted for any reason |
1417 / 2314 (61,2%) |
1385 / 2317 (59,8%) |
1,02 |
[0,98;1,07] |
|
Patients with fatal and non-fatal MI |
61 / 2314 (2,6%) |
70 / 2317 (3,0%) |
0,87 |
[0,62;1,22] |
|
Patients with fatal and non-fatal stroke |
82 / 2314 (3,5%) |
66 / 2317 (2,8%) |
1,24 |
[0,90;1,71] |
|
Total mortality |
657 / 2314 (28,4%) |
644 / 2317 (27,8%) |
1,02 |
[0,93;1,12] |
|
death by Acute myocardial infarction |
10 / 2314 (0,4%) |
15 / 2317 (0,6%) |
0,67 |
[0,30;1,48] |
|
death by Worsening of heart failure |
203 / 2314 (8,8%) |
231 / 2317 (10,0%) |
0,88 |
[0,74;1,05] |
|
death by Presumed arrhythmic |
198 / 2314 (8,6%) |
182 / 2317 (7,9%) |
1,09 |
[0,90;1,32] |
|
fatal Stroke |
38 / 2314 (1,6%) |
29 / 2317 (1,3%) |
1,31 |
[0,81;2,12] |
|
Other cardiovascular death |
29 / 2314 (1,3%) |
31 / 2317 (1,3%) |
0,94 |
[0,57;1,55] |
|
death by Neoplasia |
81 / 2314 (3,5%) |
75 / 2317 (3,2%) |
1,08 |
[0,79;1,47] |
|
Other non-cardiovascular death |
75 / 2314 (3,2%) |
55 / 2317 (2,4%) |
1,37 |
[0,97;1,92] |
|
Not known cause of death |
23 / 2314 (1,0%) |
26 / 2317 (1,1%) |
0,89 |
[0,51;1,55] |
|
Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
new-onset diabetes
225 / 1660
215 / 1718
1,08 [0,91;1,29]
All cause death
657 / 2314
644 / 2317
1,02 [0,93;1,12]
Non vascular death
156 / 2314
130 / 2317
1,20 [0,96;1,51]
Cardiovascular death
478 / 2314
488 / 2317
0,98 [0,88;1,10]
Fatal MI
10 / 2314
15 / 2317
0,67 [0,30;1,48]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
82 / 2314
66 / 2317
1,24 [0,90;1,71]
cardiovascular events
1033 / 2314
1060 / 2317
0,98 [0,92;1,04]
Fatal stroke
38 / 2314
29 / 2317
classic
1,31 [0,81;2,12]
myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)
61 / 2314
70 / 2317
0,87 [0,62;1,22]
Coronary event
61 / 2314
70 / 2317
0,87 [0,62;1,22]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
new-onset diabetes
|
225 / 1660 (13,6%) |
215 / 1718 (12,5%) |
1,08 |
[0,91;1,29] |
sub group |
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
82 / 2314 (3,5%) |
66 / 2317 (2,8%) |
1,24 |
[0,90;1,71] |
|
0 |
Fatal stroke
|
38 / 2314 (1,6%) |
29 / 2317 (1,3%) |
1,31 |
[0,81;2,12] |
fatal Stroke |
|
myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)
|
61 / 2314 (2,6%) |
70 / 2317 (3,0%) |
0,87 |
[0,62;1,22] |
|
0 |
Cardiovascular death
|
478 / 2314 (20,7%) |
488 / 2317 (21,1%) |
0,98 |
[0,88;1,10] |
Patients who died of cardiovascular reasons |
|
Coronary event
|
61 / 2314 (2,6%) |
70 / 2317 (3,0%) |
0,87 |
[0,62;1,22] |
Patients with fatal and non-fatal MI |
|
Non vascular death
|
156 / 2314 (6,7%) |
130 / 2317 (5,6%) |
1,20 |
[0,96;1,51] |
|
|
cardiovascular events
|
1033 / 2314 (44,6%) |
1060 / 2317 (45,7%) |
0,98 |
[0,92;1,04] |
Patients admitted for a cardiovascular reason |
18152 |
All cause death
|
657 / 2314 (28,4%) |
644 / 2317 (27,8%) |
1,02 |
[0,93;1,12] |
Total mortality |
|
Fatal MI
|
10 / 2314 (0,4%) |
15 / 2317 (0,6%) |
0,67 |
[0,30;1,48] |
death by Acute myocardial infarction |
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
18152: Tavazzi L, Maggioni AP, Marchioli R, Barlera S, Franzosi MG, Latini R, Lucci D, Nicolosi GL, Porcu M, Tognoni GEffect of rosuvastatin in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet 2008;372:1231-9
0:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 3.9y median (IQR 3-4.4))
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
new-onset diabetes |
13,55% |
12,51% |
1,0%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
3,54% |
2,85% |
0,70%
|
Fatal stroke |
1,64% |
1,25% |
0,39%
|
myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) |
2,64% |
3,02% |
-0,39%
|
Cardiovascular death |
20,66% |
21,06% |
-0,40%
|
Coronary event |
2,64% |
3,02% |
-0,39%
|
Non vascular death |
6,74% |
5,61% |
1,1%
|
cardiovascular events |
44,64% |
45,75% |
-1,11%
|
All cause death |
28,39% |
27,79% |
0,60%
|
Fatal MI |
4,32‰ |
6,47‰ |
-0,22%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
cholesterol lowering intervention in heart failure for all type of patients
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC7346
|
Trials register # |
NCT00336336
|
-
Tavazzi L, Tognoni G, Franzosi MG, Latini R, Maggioni AP, Marchioli R, Nicolosi GL, Porcu M.
Rationale and design of the GISSI heart failure trial: a large trial to assess the effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and rosuvastatin in symptomatic congestive heart failure..
Eur J Heart Fail 2004 Aug;6:635-41
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Tavazzi L, Maggioni AP, Marchioli R, Barlera S, Franzosi MG, Latini R, Lucci D, Nicolosi GL, Porcu M, Tognoni G.
Effect of rosuvastatin in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial..
Lancet 2008;372:1231-9
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|