Related trials
ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
Guyton, 2008 - niacin+ezetimibe vs simvastatin+ezetimibe
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of niacin
All clinical trials of niacin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
high-dose, extended-release niacin in gradually increasing doses up to 2000 mg daily (+ simvastatin)
high-dose extended-release niacin (Niaspan) given in addition to statin therapy
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Concomittant treatment |
simvastatin (and ezetimibe, in order to maintain LDL-cholesterol levels at the target range between 40 and 80 mg/dL) |
Patients
Patients |
patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, high triglycerides, and low levels of HDL cholesterol |
Inclusion criteria |
men and women; >=45 years old; with established vascular disease and atherogenic dyslipidemia;
established vascular disease defined as one or more of the following: (1) documented coronary artery disease (CAD); (2) documented cerebrovascular or carotid disease; (3) documented symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD)
Atherogenic dyslipidemia defined as: (1) LDL-C of less than or equal to 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L); (2) HDL-C of less than or equal to 40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) for men or less than or equal to 50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) for women; (3) TG greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) and less than or equal to 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L)
For patients entering the trial on a statin: (1) the upper limit for LDL-C is adjusted according to the specific statin and statin dose; (2) HDL-C of less than or equal to 42 mg/dL (1.1 mmol/L) for men or less than or equal to 53 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) for women; (3) TG greater than or equal to 125 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) and less than or equal to 400 mg/DL (4.5 mmol/L)
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
1718 / 1691 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
32 months |
Premature discontinuation |
Premature discontinuation for futility |
Geographic area |
US, Canada |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
CHD death, MI, ischaemic stroke, NSTEMI |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
112 / 1718
106 / 1691
1,04 [0,80;1,34]
cardiovascular events
282 / 1718
274 / 1696
1,02 [0,87;1,18]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
27 / 1718
15 / 1696
classic
1,78 [0,95;3,33]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
cardiovascular events
|
282 / 1718 (16,4%) |
274 / 1696 (16,2%) |
1,02 |
[0,87;1,18] |
|
16313 |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
27 / 1718 (1,6%) |
15 / 1696 (0,9%) |
1,78 |
[0,95;3,33] |
|
16313 |
Coronary event
|
112 / 1718 (6,5%) |
106 / 1691 (6,3%) |
1,04 |
[0,80;1,34] |
|
16313 |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
16313: Lavigne PM, Karas RHThe current state of niacin in cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-regression.J Am Coll Cardiol 2013 Jan 29;61:440-6
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 32 months)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
cardiovascular events |
16,41% |
16,16% |
0,26%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,57% |
8,84‰ |
0,69%
|
Coronary event |
6,52% |
6,27% |
0,25%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
niacin in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC9754
|
Trials register # |
NCT00120289
|
-
Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, Chaitman BR, Desvignes-Nickens P, Koprowicz K, McBride R, Teo K, Weintraub W.
Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy..
N Engl J Med 2011;365:2255-67
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1107579
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|