Related trials
PHS II vitamin C, 2008 - vitamin C vs placebo
POPADAD (antioxydant), 2008 - combination vs placebo
ARISE, 2008 - succinobucol vs placebo
PHS II vitamin E, 2008 - vitamin E vs placebo
WACS beta-caroten, 2007 - beta carotene vs placebo
WACS vitamin E, 2007 - vitamin E vs placebo
WACS vitamin C, 2007 - vitamin C vs placebo
WHS vitamin E, 2005 - vitamin E vs placebo
SUVIMAX, 2005 - combination vs placebo
PHS II beta carotene, 2003 - combination vs placebo
Tepel, 2003 - acetylcysteine vs placebo
WAVE (Waters), 2002 - combination vs placebo
HPS antioxidant, 2002 - combination vs placebo
HATS, 2001 - combination vs placebo
PPP, 2001 - vitamin E vs control
AREDS, 2001 - vitamin E vs placebo
HOPE, 2000 - vitamin E vs placebo
ASAP, 2000 - vitamin E vs placebo
WHS beta carotene, 1999 - beta carotene vs placebo
GISSI, 1999 - vitamin E vs control
NSCP (Green) beta carotene, 1999 - beta carotene vs placebo
MVP, 1997 - combination vs placebo
PHS beta carotene, 1996 - beta carotene vs placebo
CARET beta carotene, 1996 - beta carotene vs placebo
CHAOS, 1996 - vitamin E vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of antioxydants
All clinical trials of vitamin E
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
vitamin E 600 IU every other day (á-tocopherol)
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Remarks |
factorial design vitamin E or placebo and aspirin or placebo |
Patients
Patients |
apparently healthy US women aged at least 45 years |
Inclusion criteria |
age 45 years or older; no previous history of coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer), or other major chronic illnesses; no history of adverse effects from aspirin; no use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) more than once a week, or willingness to forgo their use; no use of anticoagulants or corticosteroids; and no use of individual supplements of vitamin A, E, or beta carotene more than once a week |
Baseline characteristics |
Women (%) |
100% |
age (yr) |
54.6 y |
Body mass index |
26.04 |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
19937 / 19939 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Factorial plan |
Blinding |
double-blind |
Follow-up duration |
10.1 y |
Lost to follow-up |
2.8% (morbidity) |
Geographic area |
US |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
major cardiovascular event |
Remarks |
two primary endpoint specified without method for dealing with multiplicity |
Results
Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
|
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Major cardiovascular event* |
482 / 19937 (2,4%) |
517 / 19939 (2,6%) |
0,93 |
[0,82;1,05] |
|
Myocardial infarction |
196 / 19937 (1,0%) |
195 / 19939 (1,0%) |
1,01 |
[0,83;1,22] |
|
Nonfatal |
184 / 19937 (0,9%) |
181 / 19939 (0,9%) |
1,02 |
[0,83;1,25] |
|
Fatal |
12 / 19937 (0,1%) |
14 / 19939 (0,1%) |
0,86 |
[0,40;1,85] |
|
Stroke |
241 / 19937 (1,2%) |
246 / 19939 (1,2%) |
0,98 |
[0,82;1,17] |
|
Nonfatal stroke |
220 / 19937 (1,1%) |
222 / 19939 (1,1%) |
0,99 |
[0,82;1,19] |
|
Fatal stroke |
21 / 19937 (0,1%) |
24 / 19939 (0,1%) |
0,88 |
[0,49;1,57] |
|
Ischemic stroke |
194 / 19937 (1,0%) |
197 / 19939 (1,0%) |
0,98 |
[0,81;1,20] |
|
Hemorrhagic stroke |
44 / 19937 (0,2%) |
48 / 19939 (0,2%) |
0,92 |
[0,61;1,38] |
|
Cardiovascular death |
106 / 19937 (0,5%) |
140 / 19939 (0,7%) |
0,76 |
[0,59;0,97] |
|
Total invasive cancer |
1437 / 19937 (7,2%) |
1428 / 19939 (7,2%) |
1,01 |
[0,94;1,08] |
|
Breast cancer |
616 / 19937 (3,1%) |
614 / 19939 (3,1%) |
1,00 |
[0,90;1,12] |
|
Lung cancer |
107 / 19937 (0,5%) |
98 / 19939 (0,5%) |
1,09 |
[0,83;1,44] |
|
Colon cancer |
107 / 19937 (0,5%) |
107 / 19939 (0,5%) |
1,00 |
[0,77;1,31] |
|
Cancer death |
308 / 19937 (1,5%) |
275 / 19939 (1,4%) |
1,12 |
[0,95;1,32] |
|
Total mortality |
636 / 19937 (3,2%) |
615 / 19939 (3,1%) |
1,03 |
[0,93;1,15] |
|
Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
ischemic stroke
194 / 19937
197 / 19939
0,98 [0,81;1,20]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
241 / 19937
246 / 19939
0,98 [0,82;1,17]
Haemmorhagic stroke
44 / 19937
48 / 19939
0,92 [0,61;1,38]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Haemmorhagic stroke
|
44 / 19937 (0,2%) |
48 / 19939 (0,2%) |
0,92 |
[0,61;1,38] |
|
13777 |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
241 / 19937 (1,2%) |
246 / 19939 (1,2%) |
0,98 |
[0,82;1,17] |
BMJ 2010 |
13777 |
ischemic stroke
|
194 / 19937 (1,0%) |
197 / 19939 (1,0%) |
0,98 |
[0,81;1,20] |
BMJ 2010 |
13777 |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
13777: Schürks M, Glynn RJ, Rist PM, Tzourio C, Kurth TEffects of vitamin E on stroke subtypes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ 2010 Nov 4;341:c5702
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Haemmorhagic stroke |
2,21‰ |
2,41‰ |
-0,2‰
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,21% |
1,23% |
-0,2‰
|
ischemic stroke |
9,73‰ |
9,88‰ |
-0,1‰
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
antioxydants in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention
antioxydants in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
-
Lee IM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Buring JE.
Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: the Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial..
JAMA 2005;294:56-65
- 10.1001/jama.294.1.56
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|