Related trials
PHS II vitamin C, 2008 - vitamin C vs placebo
POPADAD (antioxydant), 2008 - combination vs placebo
ARISE, 2008 - succinobucol vs placebo
PHS II vitamin E, 2008 - vitamin E vs placebo
WACS beta-caroten, 2007 - beta carotene vs placebo
WACS vitamin E, 2007 - vitamin E vs placebo
WACS vitamin C, 2007 - vitamin C vs placebo
WHS vitamin E, 2005 - vitamin E vs placebo
SUVIMAX, 2005 - combination vs placebo
HOPE renal insufficiency subgroup, 2004 - vitamin E vs placebo
PHS II beta carotene, 2003 - combination vs placebo
Tepel, 2003 - acetylcysteine vs placebo
WAVE (Waters), 2002 - combination vs placebo
HPS antioxidant, 2002 - combination vs placebo
HATS, 2001 - combination vs placebo
PPP, 2001 - vitamin E vs control
AREDS, 2001 - vitamin E vs placebo
HOPE, 2000 - vitamin E vs placebo
ASAP, 2000 - vitamin E vs placebo
SPACE, 2000 - vitamin E vs placebo
WHS beta carotene, 1999 - beta carotene vs placebo
GISSI, 1999 - vitamin E vs control
NSCP (Green) beta carotene, 1999 - beta carotene vs placebo
ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (vitamin E), 1998 - vitamin E vs placebo
ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (b carotene), 1998 - beta carotene vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of antioxydants
All clinical trials of combination
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
400 IU of vitamin E twice daily plus 500 mg of vitamin C twice daily
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Remarks |
factorial design of 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen (plus 2.5 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone
acetate for women who had not had a hysterectomy) |
Patients
Patients |
postmenopausal women with at least one 15% to 75% coronary stenosis |
Baseline characteristics |
Women (%) |
100% |
age (yr) |
65 y |
Body mass index |
31 |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
212 / 211 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Factorial plan |
Blinding |
double-blind |
Follow-up duration |
2.8 years |
Number of centre |
7 |
Geographic area |
US, Canada |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
change in minimum lumen diameter |
Results
Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
|
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
All deaths |
16 / 212 (7,5%) |
6 / 211 (2,8%) |
2,65 |
[1,06;6,65] |
|
Cardiovascular deaths |
10 / 212 (4,7%) |
4 / 211 (1,9%) |
2,49 |
[0,79;7,81] |
|
Nonfatal MI |
4 / 212 (1,9%) |
4 / 211 (1,9%) |
1,00 |
[0,25;3,93] |
|
Death or nonfatal MI |
20 / 212 (9,4%) |
10 / 211 (4,7%) |
1,99 |
[0,95;4,15] |
|
Cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI |
14 / 212 (6,6%) |
8 / 211 (3,8%) |
1,74 |
[0,75;4,06] |
|
Stroke |
6 / 212 (2,8%) |
7 / 211 (3,3%) |
0,85 |
[0,29;2,50] |
|
Death, nonfatal MI, or stroke |
26 / 212 (12,3%) |
18 / 211 (8,5%) |
1,44 |
[0,81;2,54] |
|
PCI or CABG surgery |
40 / 212 (18,9%) |
38 / 211 (18,0%) |
1,05 |
[0,70;1,56] |
|
Pulmonary embolus or deep vein thrombosis |
5 / 212 (2,4%) |
3 / 211 (1,4%) |
1,66 |
[0,40;6,85] |
|
|
Not calculable (data not available) |
Breast Cancer |
3 / 212 (1,4%) |
1 / 211 (0,5%) |
2,99 |
[0,31;28,48] |
|
Other cancer |
3 / 212 (1,4%) |
4 / 211 (1,9%) |
0,75 |
[0,17;3,29] |
|
Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Cardiovascular death
10 / 212
4 / 211
classic
2,49 [0,79;7,81]
Non fatal MI
4 / 212
4 / 211
classic
1,00 [0,25;3,93]
All cause death
16 / 212
6 / 211
classic
2,65 [1,06;6,65]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
6 / 212
7 / 211
classic
0,85 [0,29;2,50]
cardiovascular events
25 / 212
16 / 211
classic
1,56 [0,86;2,83]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Cardiovascular death
|
10 / 212 (4,7%) |
4 / 211 (1,9%) |
2,49 |
[0,79;7,81] |
|
2949 |
Non fatal MI
|
4 / 212 (1,9%) |
4 / 211 (1,9%) |
1,00 |
[0,25;3,93] |
|
2949 |
cardiovascular events
|
25 / 212 (11,8%) |
16 / 211 (7,6%) |
1,56 |
[0,86;2,83] |
death,MI, stroke |
2949 |
All cause death
|
16 / 212 (7,5%) |
6 / 211 (2,8%) |
2,65 |
[1,06;6,65] |
|
2949 |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
6 / 212 (2,8%) |
7 / 211 (3,3%) |
0,85 |
[0,29;2,50] |
|
2949 |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
2949: Waters DD, Alderman EL, Hsia J, Howard BV, Cobb FR, Rogers WJ, Ouyang P, Thompson P, Tardif JC, Higginson L, Bittner V, Steffes M, Gordon DJ, Proschan M, Younes N, Verter JIEffects of hormone replacement therapy and antioxidant vitamin supplements on coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA 2002 Nov 20;288:2432-40
0:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Cardiovascular death |
4,72% |
1,90% |
2,8%
|
Non fatal MI |
1,89% |
1,90% |
-0,1‰
|
cardiovascular events |
11,79% |
7,58% |
4,2%
|
All cause death |
7,55% |
2,84% |
4,7%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
2,83% |
3,32% |
-4,9‰
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
antioxydants in cardiovascular prevention for secondary prevention
antioxydants in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
Reference(s)
-
Waters DD, Alderman EL, Hsia J, Howard BV, Cobb FR, Rogers WJ, Ouyang P, Thompson P, Tardif JC, Higginson L, Bittner V, Steffes M, Gordon DJ, Proschan M, Younes N, Verter JI.
Effects of hormone replacement therapy and antioxidant vitamin supplements on coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial..
JAMA 2002 Nov 20;288:2432-40
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|