Related trials
TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
PASEO, 2009 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent
CARESS, 2008 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
MISSION, 2008 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
DEDICATION, 2008 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
D�az de la Llera, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
SESAMI, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PROSIT, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
HAAMU-STENT, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PASSION, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
WEST, 2006 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
TYPHOON, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
ZWOLLE 6, 2005 - primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
senior PAMI, 2005 - primary PCI vs Thrombolysis
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
GRACIA-1, 2004 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004 - immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty
See also:
All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
All clinical trials of PCI
All clinical trials of systematic PCI (+stent)
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
TNK-facilitated angioplasty
|
Control treatment |
TNK alone
|
Treatments description |
stent (%) |
89% |
time from thrombolysisi to PCI in invasive arm |
90 min |
|
Patients
Patients |
patients with high-risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (year) |
58 y |
female (%) |
25% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
86 / 84 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Follow-up duration |
6 months |
Primary endpoint |
death, reinfarction, recurrent unstable ischemia, stroke |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
In-hospital death
3 / 86
3 / 84
classic
0,98 [0,20;4,70]
reinfarction
5 / 86
12 / 84
0,41 [0,15;1,11]
Major bleeding
7 / 86
6 / 84
classic
1,14 [0,40;3,25]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
1 / 86
1 / 84
classic
0,98 [0,06;15,36]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
In-hospital death
|
3 / 86 (3,5%) |
3 / 84 (3,6%) |
0,98 |
[0,20;4,70] |
|
9448 |
reinfarction
|
5 / 86 (5,8%) |
12 / 84 (14,3%) |
0,41 |
[0,15;1,11] |
|
9448 |
Major bleeding
|
7 / 86 (8,1%) |
6 / 84 (7,1%) |
1,14 |
[0,40;3,25] |
|
9448 |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
1 / 86 (1,2%) |
1 / 84 (1,2%) |
0,98 |
[0,06;15,36] |
|
9448 |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
9448: Wijeysundera HC, You JJ, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, Cantor WJ, Ko DTAn early invasive strategy versus ischemia-guided management after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials.Am Heart J 2008;156:564-572, 572.e1-2
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
In-hospital death |
3,49% |
3,57% |
-0,8‰
|
reinfarction |
5,81% |
14,29% |
-84,7‰
|
Major bleeding |
8,14% |
7,14% |
10,0‰
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,16% |
1,19% |
-0,3‰
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
myocardial revascularization in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
PCI in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
Reference(s)
-
Le May MR, Wells GA, Labinaz M, Davies RF, Turek M, Leddy D, Maloney J, McKibbin T, Quinn B, Beanlands RS, Glover C, Marquis JF, O'Brien ER, Williams WL, Higginson LA.
Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study)..
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:417-24
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|