Related trials
TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
PASEO, 2009 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent
CARESS, 2008 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
MISSION, 2008 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
DEDICATION, 2008 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
D�az de la Llera, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
SESAMI, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PROSIT, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
HAAMU-STENT, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PASSION, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
WEST, 2006 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
TYPHOON, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
ZWOLLE 6, 2005 - primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
senior PAMI, 2005 - primary PCI vs Thrombolysis
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
GRACIA-1, 2004 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004 - immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty
See also:
All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
All clinical trials of PCI
All clinical trials of primary PCI
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
primary PCI without on-site cardiac surgery
|
Control treatment |
accelerated tissue plasminogen activator
|
Patients
Patients |
thrombolytic-eligible patients with acute MI of less than 12 hours' duration associated with ST-segment elevation |
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
225 / 226 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
open |
Follow-up duration |
6 months |
Number of centre |
11 |
Geographic area |
USA |
Primary endpoint |
death, recurrent MI, and stroke |
Results
No results available for this trial
- no clinical endpoint reported
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
myocardial revascularization in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
PCI in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
Reference(s)
-
Aversano T, Aversano LT, Passamani E, Knatterud GL, Terrin ML, Williams DO, Forman SA.
Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial..
JAMA 2002;287:1943-51
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|