Related trials
TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
PASEO, 2009 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent
CARESS, 2008 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
MISSION, 2008 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
DEDICATION, 2008 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
D�az de la Llera, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
SESAMI, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PROSIT, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
HAAMU-STENT, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PASSION, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
WEST, 2006 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
TYPHOON, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
ZWOLLE 6, 2005 - primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
senior PAMI, 2005 - primary PCI vs Thrombolysis
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
GRACIA-1, 2004 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004 - immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty
See also:
All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
All clinical trials of PCI
All clinical trials of primary ballon angioplasty
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
Tenecteplase + UFH (+/- clopidogrel)
|
Control treatment |
Primary angioplasty
single weight-adjusted dose of TNK along with UFH (60 U/kg bolus plus infusion with an aPTT 1.5-2)
|
Treatments description |
|
Patients
Patients |
>=75 years old with ST-segment elevation or LBBB AMI <6 hours of evolution without contraindications for thrombolytic therapy |
Inclusion criteria |
age >=75 years; chest pain or any symptom of myocardial ischemia >=20 minutes of duration, not responding to nitrate therapy within first 6 hours and at least one of the following: ST-elevation >=2 mm in >=2 precordial leads, ST-elevation >=1 mm in >=2 anterior leads, or de novo (or probably de novo) LBBB
|
Exclusion criteria |
Cardiogenic shock, estimated door-to-balloon time >120 minutes, administration of thrombolysis within 14 days prior to randomization, GP IIa/IIIb inhibitor within 24 hours prior to randomization, or LMWH within 8 hours prior to randomization, current oral anticoagulant treatment, suspected AMI secondary to occlusion of a coronary lesion treated previously with PCI, known renal failure, reduced expected life expectancy (<12 months), documented contraindication to the use of thrombolytics, including active internal bleeding or known history of hemorrhagic diathesis; history of previous stroke; intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm or cerebral aneurysm repair; major surgery, parenchymal biopsy, ocular surgery or severe trauma within 6 weeks prior to randomization; unexplained puncture in a non-compressible vascular location within 24 hours of randomization; confirmed arterial hypertension during the acute phase prior to randomization with one reliable measurement of systolic BP>180 mmHg or diastolic BP >110 mmHg; known thrombocytopenia < 100.000 platelets/�L; prolonged (>20 minutes) or traumatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the 2 weeks prior to randomization; symptoms or signs suggesting aortic dissection
|
Baseline characteristics |
Delay to treatment (PTCA vs thr) |
195min (Thr) / 245min (PCI) |
% female |
44% |
mean age |
81y |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
132 / 134 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
open |
Follow-up duration |
30 days (12 months) |
Primary endpoint |
Death or Reinfarction or Disabling stroke |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
MACE
NA / 132
NA / 134
classic
1,46 [0,81;2,63]
reinfarction
NA / 132
NA / 134
classic
1,60 [0,60;4,26]
In-hospital death
NA / 132
NA / 134
classic
1,31 [0,67;2,56]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
NA / 132
NA / 134
classic
4,03 [0,44;36,86]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
myocardial revascularization in acute myocardial infarction for Elderly patients
myocardial revascularization in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
PCI in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
PCI in acute myocardial infarction for Elderly patients
Reference(s)
-
Clauw et al.
The efficacy and safety of milnacpran in the treatment of fibromyalgia.
2007, poster 716
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Bueno H, Betriu A, Heras M, Alonso JJ, Cequier A, Garc�a EJ, L�pez-Send�n JL, Macaya C, Hern�ndez-Antol�n R.
Primary angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies..
Eur Heart J 2010;:
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq375
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|