Related trials
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Chello et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Patti et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control
FIELD, 2005 - fenofibrate vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
All clinical trials of pravastatin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
pravastatin 10 mg daily (20 mg per day if the total cholesterolconcentration did not decrease to 5·69 mmol/L or less)
|
Control treatment |
control
|
Concomittant treatment |
diet |
Treatments description |
total cholesterol change |
-11% (at 1 year) |
LDL change |
-17% (at 1 year) |
HDL change |
+4% (at 1 year) |
|
Patients
Patients |
patients with hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol 5·69–6·98 mmol/L) and no history of coronary heart disease or stroke |
Inclusion criteria |
men and postmenopausal women; aged 40–70 years; bodyweight of 40 kg or more; hypercholesterolaemia with a total cholesterol concentration between 5·69–6·98 mmol/L |
Exclusion criteria |
familial hypercholesterolaemia; history of coronary heart disease or stroke; |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
58.3 y |
Women (%) |
68.5% |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) |
6.27 |
LDL (mmol/l) |
4.05 |
HDL (mmol/l) |
1.49 |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
1.44 |
Diabetes(%) |
21% |
BMI (kg/m2) |
23.8 |
History of hypertension (%) |
42% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
3866 / 3966 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
open, blind assessment |
Follow-up duration |
5.3 y |
Geographic area |
Japan |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
CHD events |
Remarks / Comments
,
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
66 / 3866
101 / 3966
0,67 [0,49;0,91]
All cause death
55 / 3866
79 / 3966
0,71 [0,51;1,00]
Cardiovascular death
11 / 3866
18 / 3966
0,63 [0,30;1,33]
cardiovascular events
125 / 3866
172 / 3966
0,75 [0,59;0,93]
Haemmorhagic stroke
14 / 3866
16 / 3966
0,90 [0,44;1,84]
new-onset diabetes
172 / 3013
164 / 3073
1,07 [0,87;1,32]
Coronary death
17 / 3866
33 / 3966
0,53 [0,29;0,95]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
50 / 3866
62 / 3966
0,83 [0,57;1,20]
MACE
98 / 3866
144 / 3966
0,70 [0,54;0,90]
Non fatal MI
16 / 3866
30 / 3966
0,55 [0,30;1,00]
non cardiovascular death
44 / 3866
61 / 3966
0,74 [0,50;1,09]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event
|
66 / 3866 (1,7%) |
101 / 3966 (2,5%) |
0,67 |
[0,49;0,91] |
|
|
All cause death
|
55 / 3866 (1,4%) |
79 / 3966 (2,0%) |
0,71 |
[0,51;1,00] |
|
|
Cardiovascular death
|
11 / 3866 (0,3%) |
18 / 3966 (0,5%) |
0,63 |
[0,30;1,33] |
|
|
cardiovascular events
|
125 / 3866 (3,2%) |
172 / 3966 (4,3%) |
0,75 |
[0,59;0,93] |
|
|
Haemmorhagic stroke
|
14 / 3866 (0,4%) |
16 / 3966 (0,4%) |
0,90 |
[0,44;1,84] |
|
|
new-onset diabetes
|
172 / 3013 (5,7%) |
164 / 3073 (5,3%) |
1,07 |
[0,87;1,32] |
sub group |
12095 |
Coronary death
|
17 / 3866 (0,4%) |
33 / 3966 (0,8%) |
0,53 |
[0,29;0,95] |
fatal and non fatal MI |
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
50 / 3866 (1,3%) |
62 / 3966 (1,6%) |
0,83 |
[0,57;1,20] |
|
|
MACE
|
98 / 3866 (2,5%) |
144 / 3966 (3,6%) |
0,70 |
[0,54;0,90] |
|
|
Non fatal MI
|
16 / 3866 (0,4%) |
30 / 3966 (0,8%) |
0,55 |
[0,30;1,00] |
|
4115 |
non cardiovascular death
|
44 / 3866 (1,1%) |
61 / 3966 (1,5%) |
0,74 |
[0,50;1,09] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
4115: Nakamura H, Arakawa K, Itakura H, Kitabatake A, Goto Y, Toyota T, Nakaya N, Nishimoto S, Muranaka M, Yamamoto A, Mizuno K, Ohashi YPrimary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial.Lancet 2006 Sep 30;368:1155-63
0:
12095: Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, de Craen AJ, Seshasai SR, McMurray JJ, Freeman DJ, Jukema JW, Macfarlane PW, Packard CJ, Stott DJ, Westendorp RG, Shepherd J, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Marchioli R, Marfisi RM, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, TognonStatins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials.Lancet 2010 Feb 27;375:735-742
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 5.3 y)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event |
1,71% |
2,55% |
-0,84%
|
All cause death |
1,42% |
1,99% |
-0,57%
|
Cardiovascular death |
2,85‰ |
4,54‰ |
-0,17%
|
cardiovascular events |
3,23% |
4,34% |
-1,10%
|
Haemmorhagic stroke |
3,62‰ |
4,03‰ |
-0,04%
|
new-onset diabetes |
5,71% |
5,34% |
0,37%
|
Coronary death |
4,40‰ |
8,32‰ |
-0,39%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,29% |
1,56% |
-0,27%
|
MACE |
2,53% |
3,63% |
-1,10%
|
Non fatal MI |
4,14‰ |
7,56‰ |
-0,34%
|
non cardiovascular death |
1,14% |
1,54% |
-0,40%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC4974
|
Trials register # |
NCT00211705
|
-
Nakamura H, Arakawa K, Itakura H, Kitabatake A, Goto Y, Toyota T, Nakaya N, Nishimoto S, Muranaka M, Yamamoto A, Mizuno K, Ohashi Y.
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial..
Lancet 2006 Sep 30;368:1155-63
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
Nakamura H.
[Primary prevention trial by lowering hyperlipidemia on the cardiovascular disease (MEGA Study)].
Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi 2009;46:18-21
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|