Related trials
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Chello et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Patti et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control
FIELD, 2005 - fenofibrate vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
All clinical trials of atorvastatin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
atorvastatin 10mg
|
Control treatment |
placebo
placebo
|
Treatments description |
total cholesterol change |
-18% |
LDL change |
-29% |
HDL change |
+2.35% |
|
Patients
Patients |
subjects with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels below contemporaryguideline targets |
Inclusion criteria |
Male and female subjects, aged 40�75 years, type 2 diabetes by the World; Health Organization definition (17) 3 years before screening. LDL cholesterol criteria were 1) LDL cholesterol <=140 mg/dl (3.6 mmol/l) if subjects had documented myocardial infarction or an interventional procedure >=3 months before screening or 2) LDL cholesterol <=160 mg/dl (4.1 mmol/l) if not. Triglyceride levels were required to be >=600 mg/dl (6.8 mmol/l) at all visits. |
Exclusion criteria |
diabetes; myocardial infarction, interventional procedure, or episodes of unstable angina3 months before screening; HbA1c (A1C) 10%; active liver disease or hepatic dysfunction (aspartate or alanine aminotransferase levels 1.5 the upper limit of normal); severe renal dysfunction or nephrotic syndrome; congestive heart failure treated with digoxin; creatine phosphokinase 3 the upper limit of normal; blood pressure 160/100 mmHg; BMI35 kg/m2; abuse of alcohol and/or drugs; hypersensitivity to the study medication;placebo run-in compliance rate 80%; current or planned pregnancy; or use of excluded medications |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
61y |
Women (%) |
34% |
prior MI or CHD (%) |
17% |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) |
194 mg/dl |
LDL (mmol/l) |
113 md/dl |
HDL (mmol/l) |
47 mg/dl |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
146 mg/dl |
Diabetes(%) |
100% |
BMI (kg/m2) |
28.8 |
Stroke history |
5% |
History of hypertension (%) |
55% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
1211 / 1199 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
4 year |
Number of centre |
70 |
Geographic area |
14 countries |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
cardiovascular events |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
49 / 1211
66 / 1199
0,74 [0,51;1,05]
Cardiovascular death
38 / 1211
37 / 1199
1,02 [0,65;1,59]
cardiovascular events
166 / 1211
180 / 1199
0,91 [0,75;1,11]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
34 / 1211
38 / 1199
0,89 [0,56;1,40]
MACE
166 / 1211
180 / 1199
0,91 [0,75;1,11]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event
|
49 / 1211 (4,0%) |
66 / 1199 (5,5%) |
0,74 |
[0,51;1,05] |
fatal non fatal MI |
|
Cardiovascular death
|
38 / 1211 (3,1%) |
37 / 1199 (3,1%) |
1,02 |
[0,65;1,59] |
|
|
cardiovascular events
|
166 / 1211 (13,7%) |
180 / 1199 (15,0%) |
0,91 |
[0,75;1,11] |
|
6911 |
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
34 / 1211 (2,8%) |
38 / 1199 (3,2%) |
0,89 |
[0,56;1,40] |
|
|
MACE
|
166 / 1211 (13,7%) |
180 / 1199 (15,0%) |
0,91 |
[0,75;1,11] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
6911: Knopp RH, d'Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJEfficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN).Diabetes Care 2006;29:1478-85
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 4 year)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event |
4,05% |
5,50% |
-1,46%
|
Cardiovascular death |
3,14% |
3,09% |
0,05%
|
cardiovascular events |
13,71% |
15,01% |
-1,30%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
2,81% |
3,17% |
-0,36%
|
MACE |
13,71% |
15,01% |
-1,30%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC6716
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Knopp RH, d'Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJ.
Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN)..
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1478-85
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|