| 
 
		
		Related trials
		 
				 SORT-OUT-3, 2010 - zotarolimus eluting stent  vs sirolimus eluting stent 
				 SPIRIT IV, 2010 - everolimus eluting stent  vs paclitaxel eluting stent 
				 RESOLUTE All comers, 2010 - zotarolimus eluting stent  vs everolimus eluting stent 
				 ISAR-DESIRE-2, 2010 - sirolimus eluting stent  vs paclitaxel eluting stent 
				 BASKET-PROVE (EES), 2010 - everolimus eluting stent  vs bare-metal stent 
				 GISSOC II, 2010 - sirolimus eluting stent  vs bare-metal stent 
				 BASKET-PROVE (SES), 2010 - sirolimus eluting stent  vs bare-metal stent 
				 STICH (ventricular reconstruction), 2009 - CABG+surgical ventricular reconstruction  vs CABG 
				 ISAR TEST 2 (vs ZES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol eluting stent  vs zotarolimus eluting stent 
				 SYNTAX, 2009 - paclitaxel eluting stent  vs CABG 
				 ISAR-LEFT-MAIN, 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent  vs paclitaxel eluting stent 
				 COMPARE, 2009 - everolimus eluting stent  vs paclitaxel eluting stent 
				 ISAR TEST 3 (PF), 2009 - polymer free sirolimus stent  vs sirolimus eluting stent 
				 PASEO, 2009 - drug-eluting stents  vs bare-metal stent 
				 ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent  vs paclitaxel eluting stent 
				 ISAR TEST 2 (vs SES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol eluting stent  vs sirolimus eluting stent 
				 BARI 2D, 2009 - CABG or PCI  vs medical treatment 
				 ISAR-TEST-4 (biodegradable polymer), 2009 - sirolimus biodegradable polymer  vs sirolimus eluting stent 
				 ISAR TEST 3 (BP), 2009 - sirolimus biodegradable polymer  vs sirolimus eluting stent 
				 ENDEAVOR IV, 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent  vs paclitaxel eluting stent 
				 GENIUS-STEMI, 2009 - Genous stent  vs bare-metal stent 
				 ZEST (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent  vs sirolimus eluting stent 
				 ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent  vs sirolimus eluting stent 
				 Thiele, 2009 - sirolimus ES  vs MIDCAB 
				 ZEST (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent  vs paclitaxel eluting stent 
 
 
		See also:
		All coronary artery disease clinical trials
				
			
			
				
					All stable angina clinical trials
				
			
		
			
			All clinical trials of myocardial revascularization 
			
		
		
			
			All clinical trials of sirolimus eluting stent |  | Treatments
	
		| Studied treatment | coated Bx Velocity 
 |  
		| Control treatment | Bx Velocity 
 |  
			| Concomittant treatment | Clopidogrel or ticlopidine 8 weeks |  | Treatments description |  |  Patients
		
			| Patients | Stable or unstable AP, silent ischaemia; single primary target lesion in a native coronary artery |  | Baseline characteristics | 
						
							| age | 62 |  
							| diabetes (%) | 19% |  
							| lesion length (mm) | 9.6 (3.3) |  
							| %QCA follow-up | 89 |  
							| QCA follow-up duration | 6 |  
							| reference-vessel diameter | 2.60 (0.54) |  
							| lesion length inclusion criteria |  |  
							| Lesion diameter inclusion criteria | 2.5-3.5 |  
							| Female (%) | 37% |  |  Method and design
	
		| Randomized effectives | 120 / 118 (studied vs. control) |  
			| Design | Parallel groups |  
			| Blinding | double-blind |  
			| Follow-up duration | 12 months |  
			| Number of centre | 19 |  
			| Geographic area | Global |  
			| Primary endpoint | Late lumen loss |  
 
 Results
	
		
	
	
		
			Endpoint
		
	
	
		
		Studied treat.n/N
			
	
	
		
		Control treat.
 n/N
		
	
	
		
			Graph
		
	
	
		
			RR [95% CI]
 
				MACE
				7 / 120 35 / 118
 0,20 [0,09;0,43]
 
				All cause death
				2 / 120 2 / 118
 classic
					
					
					
				
			
				
				
			
			
		
			
				
					0,98 [0,14;6,87]
 
				MI (fatal and non fatal)
				4 / 120 5 / 118
 classic
					
					
					
				
			
				
				
			
			
		
			
				
					0,79 [0,22;2,86]
 
				CABG
				1 / 120 1 / 118
 classic
					
					
					
				
			
				
				
			
			
		
			
				
					0,98 [0,06;15,54]
 
				target lesion revascularisation 
				0 / 120 27 / 118
 0,01 [0,00;0,46]
 
				angiographic restenosis 
				NA / 120 NA / 118
 
 
				late stent thrombosis (31days - 1year)
				0 / 120 0 / 118
 classic
					
					
					
				
			
				
				
			
			
		
			
				
					0,98 [0,00;249,91]
 
				Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up)
				0 / 120 0 / 118
 classic
					
					
					
				
			
				
				
			
			
		
			
				
					0,98 [0,00;249,91]
				
			
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
			
				0
			
		
		
		
		
		
				2
		
		
		
		
		
			1.0
 
		
		
				
					| Relative risks |  
			| Endpoint | Events (%) | Relative Risk | 95% CI | Endpoint definition in the trial
 | Ref |  
			| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
						| MACE | 7 / 120 (5,8%) | 35 / 118 (29,7%) | 0,20 | [0,09;0,43] |  |  |  
						| All cause death | 2 / 120 (1,7%) | 2 / 118 (1,7%) | 0,98 | [0,14;6,87] |  |  |  
						| MI (fatal and non fatal) | 4 / 120 (3,3%) | 5 / 118 (4,2%) | 0,79 | [0,22;2,86] |  |  |  
						| CABG | 1 / 120 (0,8%) | 1 / 118 (0,8%) | 0,98 | [0,06;15,54] |  |  |  
						| target lesion revascularisation | 0 / 120 (0,4%) | 27 / 118 (22,9%) | 0,02 | [0,00;0,30] |  |  |  
						| angiographic restenosis | 0 / 120 (0,4%) | 31 / 118 (26,3%) | 0,02 | [0,00;0,26] |  |  |  
						| late stent thrombosis (31days - 1year) | 0 / 120 (0,4%) | 0 / 118 (0,4%) | 0,98 | [0,02;49,15] |  | 3831 |  
						| Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up) | 0 / 120 (0,4%) | 0 / 118 (0,4%) | 0,98 | [0,02;49,15] |  |  |  
			| The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters |  
			| Reference(s) used for data extraction: 
				
					3831: Moreno R, Fernandez C, Hernandez R, Alfonso F, Angiolillo DJ, Sabate M, Escaned J, Banuelos C, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Macaya CDrug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from a pooled analysis including 10 randomized studies.J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Mar 15;45:954-9
				
				
					0: |  
			
			| Endpoint | studied treat. | control treat. | mean diff |  
	
	
				
					| Absolute risk reduction |  
		| Endpoint | Events rate | Absolute risk reduction (ARR)
 |  
		| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
				| MACE | 5,83% | 29,66% | -238,3‰ |  
				| All cause death | 1,67% | 1,69% | -0,3‰ |  
				| MI (fatal and non fatal) | 3,33% | 4,24% | -9,0‰ |  
				| CABG | 8,33‰ | 8,47‰ | -0,1‰ |  Meta-analysis of all similar trials: 
				
					Drug eluting stent in coronary artery disease for all type of patients
				
			 
				
					Drug eluting stent in coronary artery disease for unparticular patients
				
			 
				
					myocardial revascularization in coronary artery disease for all type of patient
				
			 
				
					myocardial revascularization in stable angina for all type of patient
				
			 
 
 
		 Reference(s)
			
				
			    Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnr F, Falotico R. 
			    A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization..
			    N Engl J Med 2002;346:1773-80
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext
				
			    Morice MC, Serruys PW, Barragan P, Bode C, Van Es GA, Stoll HP, Snead D, Mauri L, Cutlip DE, Sousa E. 
			    Long-term clinical outcomes with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: five-year results of the RAVEL trial..
			    J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 Oct 2;50:1299-304
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext 
 |